Mengembalikan Tahapan Uji Publik Pada Pilkada

Marliana Eka Fauzia
{"title":"Mengembalikan Tahapan Uji Publik Pada Pilkada","authors":"Marliana Eka Fauzia","doi":"10.55108/jap.v3i2.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The writing of this article is intended to evaluate the urgency of revising the Pilkada Law, on eliminating public examination points. The DPR removed public test points in the revision of the Election Law No. 1 of 2015, and was replaced by the Election Law No. 8 of 2015. Until the current election law No. 10 of 2016 there has been no re-discussion regarding the stages of public testing. The public test is a stage of competency and integrity testing for candidates for regional head and representative in an open manner which is independently formed by the Provincial / Regency / City KPU. Public test points were removed on the grounds that they were inefficient and time consuming. Based on this, the authors identify that the elimination of public testing can limit public participation in deliberative public spaces. And if the public test is returned at the election stage, it can improve the quality of democracy. As a theoretical review in this article the writer uses the concept of public space. While the research method uses qualitative through literature study. The results of this paper indicate that it is important to maintain a public test mechanism to restore the public space for the implementation of the elections. The existence of this public space ensures that there is space for public participation, the public can find out the track record of the candidates, build communication between candidates and voters and that public trials can be used as a deliberative campaign. Therefore, the public test can be returned to the election mechanism by adding a committee from various elements of society (farmers, laborers, entrepreneurs, village heads, educators, students and other elements of civil society). So that the public test becomes the preliminary election before the election day takes place.","PeriodicalId":168397,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55108/jap.v3i2.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The writing of this article is intended to evaluate the urgency of revising the Pilkada Law, on eliminating public examination points. The DPR removed public test points in the revision of the Election Law No. 1 of 2015, and was replaced by the Election Law No. 8 of 2015. Until the current election law No. 10 of 2016 there has been no re-discussion regarding the stages of public testing. The public test is a stage of competency and integrity testing for candidates for regional head and representative in an open manner which is independently formed by the Provincial / Regency / City KPU. Public test points were removed on the grounds that they were inefficient and time consuming. Based on this, the authors identify that the elimination of public testing can limit public participation in deliberative public spaces. And if the public test is returned at the election stage, it can improve the quality of democracy. As a theoretical review in this article the writer uses the concept of public space. While the research method uses qualitative through literature study. The results of this paper indicate that it is important to maintain a public test mechanism to restore the public space for the implementation of the elections. The existence of this public space ensures that there is space for public participation, the public can find out the track record of the candidates, build communication between candidates and voters and that public trials can be used as a deliberative campaign. Therefore, the public test can be returned to the election mechanism by adding a committee from various elements of society (farmers, laborers, entrepreneurs, village heads, educators, students and other elements of civil society). So that the public test becomes the preliminary election before the election day takes place.
在皮尔卡达恢复公众测试阶段
这篇文章的写作是为了评估修改Pilkada法的紧迫性,关于取消公共考试点。在2015年第1号《选举法》的修改中,取消了公共考点,改为2015年第8号《选举法》。在现行选举法2016年第10号之前,没有重新讨论过公开测试的阶段。公开考试是以公开方式对地区负责人和代表候选人进行能力和诚信测试的阶段,由省/县/市KPU独立组织。公共测试点被移除的理由是它们效率低下且耗时。基于此,作者认为,取消公共测试可能会限制公众参与审议公共空间。如果在选举阶段恢复公开测试,可以提高民主的质量。作为一种理论回顾,作者在本文中使用了公共空间的概念。而研究方法采用定性通过文献研究。本文的研究结果表明,维持公共测试机制对于恢复选举实施的公共空间至关重要。这一公共空间的存在确保了公众参与的空间,公众可以了解候选人的履历,建立候选人与选民之间的沟通,使公开审判可以作为一种审议性的竞选活动。因此,可以通过增加一个来自社会各阶层(农民、劳动者、企业家、村长、教育工作者、学生等公民社会各阶层)的委员会,将公试回归到选举机制。因此,公开测试成为选举日之前的预选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信