Origin of the “People and the Name of the Russian” from the Roxolan Tribe: on the Question of the Existence of Ideas in the Communicative Space of Early New Age

S. Sokolov
{"title":"Origin of the “People and the Name of the Russian” from the Roxolan Tribe: on the Question of the Existence of Ideas in the Communicative Space of Early New Age","authors":"S. Sokolov","doi":"10.24224/2227-1295-2019-12-364-378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of the origin, functioning and evolution in the historiography of the early New Age of an idea that raises the origin of the Russian people to the Roxolani is considered in the article. Particular attention is paid to the study of the transition of the Roxolan idea from the Italian humanists of the Renaissance through Polish historians of the 16 th century to the works of Russian historians of the 18th - early 19th centuries. The author dwells in detail on the argument in favor of the Roxolan concept. It is shown that the historiography of the New Age should be considered as a single communicative space, providing information exchange between historians of different regions. The author comes to the conclusion that in the Roxolan version we are dealing with a powerful intellectual tradition related to the ethnogenetic searches of the early New Age. It is proved that these searches were typical of various national schools of historical writing. The article provides an overview of the work of modern followers of the Roxolan concept and concludes that in these attempts you can see a kind of dialogue with pre-scientific knowledge and a certain inertia of the scientific ideas of the early New Age.","PeriodicalId":190169,"journal":{"name":"Nauchnyy dialog","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nauchnyy dialog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2019-12-364-378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The question of the origin, functioning and evolution in the historiography of the early New Age of an idea that raises the origin of the Russian people to the Roxolani is considered in the article. Particular attention is paid to the study of the transition of the Roxolan idea from the Italian humanists of the Renaissance through Polish historians of the 16 th century to the works of Russian historians of the 18th - early 19th centuries. The author dwells in detail on the argument in favor of the Roxolan concept. It is shown that the historiography of the New Age should be considered as a single communicative space, providing information exchange between historians of different regions. The author comes to the conclusion that in the Roxolan version we are dealing with a powerful intellectual tradition related to the ethnogenetic searches of the early New Age. It is proved that these searches were typical of various national schools of historical writing. The article provides an overview of the work of modern followers of the Roxolan concept and concludes that in these attempts you can see a kind of dialogue with pre-scientific knowledge and a certain inertia of the scientific ideas of the early New Age.
罗克兰部落“人与俄国人名”的起源——论新时代早期交际空间中观念的存在问题
文章考虑了新时代早期历史编纂中提出的一种将俄罗斯人的起源提升到罗索拉尼人的思想的起源、功能和演变问题。特别关注的是罗克索兰思想的过渡研究,从文艺复兴时期的意大利人文主义者到16世纪的波兰历史学家,再到18世纪至19世纪初的俄罗斯历史学家的作品。作者详细论述了支持罗克兰概念的论点。研究表明,新时期史学应被视为一个单一的交流空间,提供不同地区史家之间的信息交流。作者得出的结论是,在罗克兰的版本中,我们正在处理与新时代早期的民族遗传学研究有关的强大的知识传统。事实证明,这些研究是各民族历史写作流派的典型。这篇文章概述了罗克兰概念的现代追随者的工作,并得出结论,在这些尝试中,你可以看到一种与前科学知识的对话,以及新时代早期科学思想的某种惰性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信