Power-optimal pipelining in deep submicron technology

Seongmoo Heo, K. Asanović
{"title":"Power-optimal pipelining in deep submicron technology","authors":"Seongmoo Heo, K. Asanović","doi":"10.1145/1013235.1013291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the effectiveness of pipelining as a power saving tool, where the reduction in logic depth per stage is used to reduce supply voltage at a fixed clock frequency. We examine power-optimal pipelining in deep submicron technology, both analytically and by simulation. Simulation uses a 70 nm predictive process with a fanout-of-four inverter chain model including input/output flipflops, and results are shown to match theory well. The simulation results show that power-optimal logic depth is 6 to 8 FO4 and optimal power saving varies from 55 to 80% compared to a 24 FO4 logic depth, depending on threshold voltage, activity factor, and presence of clock-gating. We decompose the power consumption of a circuit into three components, switching power, leakage power, and idle power, and present the following insights into power-optimal pipelining. First, power-optimal logic depth decreases and optimal power savings increase for larger activity factors, where switching power dominates over leakage and idle power. Second, pipelining is more effective with lower threshold voltages at high activity factors, but higher threshold voltages give better results at lower activity factors where leakage current dominates. Lastly, clock-gating enables deeper pipelining and more power saving because it reduces timing element overhead when the activity factor is low.","PeriodicalId":120002,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8758)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2004 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8758)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1013235.1013291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

Abstract

This paper explores the effectiveness of pipelining as a power saving tool, where the reduction in logic depth per stage is used to reduce supply voltage at a fixed clock frequency. We examine power-optimal pipelining in deep submicron technology, both analytically and by simulation. Simulation uses a 70 nm predictive process with a fanout-of-four inverter chain model including input/output flipflops, and results are shown to match theory well. The simulation results show that power-optimal logic depth is 6 to 8 FO4 and optimal power saving varies from 55 to 80% compared to a 24 FO4 logic depth, depending on threshold voltage, activity factor, and presence of clock-gating. We decompose the power consumption of a circuit into three components, switching power, leakage power, and idle power, and present the following insights into power-optimal pipelining. First, power-optimal logic depth decreases and optimal power savings increase for larger activity factors, where switching power dominates over leakage and idle power. Second, pipelining is more effective with lower threshold voltages at high activity factors, but higher threshold voltages give better results at lower activity factors where leakage current dominates. Lastly, clock-gating enables deeper pipelining and more power saving because it reduces timing element overhead when the activity factor is low.
深亚微米技术中的功率优化流水线
本文探讨了流水线作为一种节能工具的有效性,其中每级逻辑深度的减少用于降低固定时钟频率下的电源电压。我们分析和模拟了深亚微米技术中的功率最优流水线。仿真采用70 nm预测工艺,采用包含输入/输出触发器的四扇通逆变器链模型,结果与理论吻合良好。仿真结果表明,与24 FO4逻辑深度相比,功率最优逻辑深度为6至8 FO4,最优省电范围为55至80%,具体取决于阈值电压、活动因子和时钟门控的存在。我们将电路的功耗分解为三个部分:开关功率、漏电功率和空闲功率,并对功率优化流水线提出以下见解。首先,对于较大的活动因数,功率最优逻辑深度降低,最优功耗节省增加,其中开关功率占主导地位,而不是泄漏和空闲功率。其次,在活度系数高的情况下,较低的阈值电压对管道输送更有效,但在泄漏电流占主导地位的较低活度系数下,较高的阈值电压效果更好。最后,时钟门控可以实现更深层次的流水线和更省电,因为当活动因子较低时,它可以减少定时元件的开销。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信