Ban on Plastic Bags Usage: Consumer Perception of Single-Use Plastic Bags in Traditional Market

P. Angriani, M. Muhaimin, K. Hastuti, S. Adyatma, A. N. Saputra
{"title":"Ban on Plastic Bags Usage: Consumer Perception of Single-Use Plastic Bags in Traditional Market","authors":"P. Angriani, M. Muhaimin, K. Hastuti, S. Adyatma, A. N. Saputra","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210222.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy of prohibiting the use of disposable plastic bags in force in Indonesia is an attempt by the government to reduce the amount of plastic waste. However, the effectiveness of the policy is still questionable, because it is only applied in modern retail stores, while the biggest contributor to plastic bag waste is in the traditional market. This study aims to determine consumer perceptions of government policy regarding the prohibition of the use of disposable plastic bags in traditional markets and the amount of their willingness to pay (willingness to pay) for each plastic bag used. Data was collected using a survey questionnaire to traditional market consumers. The results of the study revealed that the majority of consumers agreed if the policy was applied in traditional markets, but with a note of its gradual application. They also agreed with the implementation of paid plastic bags. Their reasoning is based on the perception that the policy can increase public awareness and concern to reduce the use of disposable plastic bags. The average value of consumers' willingness to pay for a plastic bag varies and can still be reached, so consumers are still willing to pay more. So, if you want to reduce the use of plastic bags in the community, the price of plastic bags must be even more expensive or look for alternatives to plastic bags, such as the use of shopping baskets/bags or the use of environmentally friendly plastic bags.","PeriodicalId":350819,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020)","volume":"344 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210222.036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The policy of prohibiting the use of disposable plastic bags in force in Indonesia is an attempt by the government to reduce the amount of plastic waste. However, the effectiveness of the policy is still questionable, because it is only applied in modern retail stores, while the biggest contributor to plastic bag waste is in the traditional market. This study aims to determine consumer perceptions of government policy regarding the prohibition of the use of disposable plastic bags in traditional markets and the amount of their willingness to pay (willingness to pay) for each plastic bag used. Data was collected using a survey questionnaire to traditional market consumers. The results of the study revealed that the majority of consumers agreed if the policy was applied in traditional markets, but with a note of its gradual application. They also agreed with the implementation of paid plastic bags. Their reasoning is based on the perception that the policy can increase public awareness and concern to reduce the use of disposable plastic bags. The average value of consumers' willingness to pay for a plastic bag varies and can still be reached, so consumers are still willing to pay more. So, if you want to reduce the use of plastic bags in the community, the price of plastic bags must be even more expensive or look for alternatives to plastic bags, such as the use of shopping baskets/bags or the use of environmentally friendly plastic bags.
禁止使用塑胶袋:传统市场中消费者对一次性塑胶袋的看法
印度尼西亚现行的禁止使用一次性塑料袋的政策是政府减少塑料垃圾数量的一种尝试。然而,该政策的有效性仍然值得怀疑,因为它只适用于现代零售商店,而塑料袋浪费的最大贡献者是在传统市场。本研究旨在确定消费者对政府关于禁止在传统市场使用一次性塑料袋的政策的看法,以及他们愿意为使用的每个塑料袋支付的金额(意愿支付)。通过对传统市场消费者的问卷调查收集数据。研究结果显示,大多数消费者同意在传统市场实施该政策,但注意到该政策的逐步实施。他们还同意实施付费塑料袋。他们的理由是基于这样一种看法,即该政策可以提高公众的意识和关注,减少一次性塑料袋的使用。消费者愿意为一个塑料袋支付的平均价值是不同的,仍然可以达到,所以消费者仍然愿意支付更多的钱。所以,如果你想在社区中减少塑料袋的使用,塑料袋的价格必须更加昂贵或寻找塑料袋的替代品,例如使用购物篮/袋或使用环保塑料袋。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信