SYSTEM-ORGANIZED COMBINATION OF VALUE-ORIENTED DOMINANT FORMATION OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC SPACE

V. Mykytenko
{"title":"SYSTEM-ORGANIZED COMBINATION OF VALUE-ORIENTED DOMINANT FORMATION OF NATURAL AND ECONOMIC SPACE","authors":"V. Mykytenko","doi":"10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The triad of value-oriented dominants of development, formation, and practical implementation into the economy, as well as further development in the resource limitations of the five-dimensional spatial system of natural resources assets management system in Ukraine were defined and described. They were disclosed according to three areas of generation of multi-component capacities for rationalization of spatial management, which are delineated according to constitutive and key properties of management of the natural and economic space of the state, its regions, and separate territories. Grouping and delineation were carried out in the directions which: are caused by the structure and target and specific functions of the system; form the capacity of a complex system for self-preservation; characterize the behavioural tactic and strategy of a spatial system for achievement of the objective and resolving the target tasks in the field of rationalization of the state’s natural resources assets management.\nA set of model solutions was worked out and justified for calculation of the basic indices of its operation, namely: the relative organization of the spatial system architecture, structural and functional organization of its parameters, degree of uncertainty of the condition of a multi-dimensional management system, reliability of its operation as capacities for failure-free operation in various conditions of functioning, capacity of the spatial system and its five subsystems for self-preservation.\nIt was proved and confirmed that building up a new format of a spatial system of natural resources assets management with simultaneous incorporation of the provisions of the systemic, synergetic, structural and informational, and platform theoretical approaches protects rationalization of development and usage of the existing strategic potential of Ukraine and its regions based on the consequences of achievement of sustainable economy with resource limitations, accompanied with constant growth of socio-political threats and risks.","PeriodicalId":404902,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37100/2616-7689/2019/6(25)/6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The triad of value-oriented dominants of development, formation, and practical implementation into the economy, as well as further development in the resource limitations of the five-dimensional spatial system of natural resources assets management system in Ukraine were defined and described. They were disclosed according to three areas of generation of multi-component capacities for rationalization of spatial management, which are delineated according to constitutive and key properties of management of the natural and economic space of the state, its regions, and separate territories. Grouping and delineation were carried out in the directions which: are caused by the structure and target and specific functions of the system; form the capacity of a complex system for self-preservation; characterize the behavioural tactic and strategy of a spatial system for achievement of the objective and resolving the target tasks in the field of rationalization of the state’s natural resources assets management. A set of model solutions was worked out and justified for calculation of the basic indices of its operation, namely: the relative organization of the spatial system architecture, structural and functional organization of its parameters, degree of uncertainty of the condition of a multi-dimensional management system, reliability of its operation as capacities for failure-free operation in various conditions of functioning, capacity of the spatial system and its five subsystems for self-preservation. It was proved and confirmed that building up a new format of a spatial system of natural resources assets management with simultaneous incorporation of the provisions of the systemic, synergetic, structural and informational, and platform theoretical approaches protects rationalization of development and usage of the existing strategic potential of Ukraine and its regions based on the consequences of achievement of sustainable economy with resource limitations, accompanied with constant growth of socio-political threats and risks.
价值导向的系统组织结合主导形成自然空间和经济空间
定义和描述了乌克兰自然资源资产管理系统五维空间系统的发展、形成和实际实施的价值导向的三位一体,以及资源限制的进一步发展。它们是根据产生空间管理合理化的多成分能力的三个领域来披露的,这些领域是根据国家、地区和独立领土的自然和经济空间管理的构成和关键属性来划定的。根据系统的结构、目标和具体功能,从以下几个方向进行了分组和划分;形成一个复杂系统的自我保存能力;描述在国家自然资源资产管理合理化领域实现目标和解决目标任务的空间系统的行为策略和战略。为计算其运行的基本指标,编制并论证了一组模型解,即:空间系统结构的相对组织,其参数的结构和功能组织,多维管理系统条件的不确定性程度,其运行的可靠性,在各种功能条件下无故障运行的能力,空间系统及其五个子系统的自我保存能力。事实证明并证实,建立一种自然资源资产管理空间系统的新形式,同时纳入系统的、协同的、结构的、信息的和平台理论方法的规定,可以在实现资源有限的可持续经济的结果的基础上,保护乌克兰及其区域现有战略潜力的开发和利用合理化,伴随着不断增长的社会政治威胁和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信