A backward protocol verification method

Chung-Ming Huang, Duen-Tay Huang
{"title":"A backward protocol verification method","authors":"Chung-Ming Huang, Duen-Tay Huang","doi":"10.1109/TENCON.1993.320039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the formal Communication Finite State Machine (CFSM) model, a communication protocol consists of several communicating entities which can be represented in some CFSMs. Global state reachability analysis is one of the most straightforward ways to automatically detect logical errors in a communication protocol specified in the CFSM model. Global state reachability analysis generates all of the reachable global states and checks the correctness one by one. Even though communication protocols are error free, global state reachability analysis still needs to be executed completely. We propose a new verification method which is called the backward protocol verification method, to detect logical errors. By analyzing the properties of deadlock error, unspecified reception error, and channel overflow error, some candidate erroneous global states are generated. Then, each candidate global state is checked whether there is a path, i.e., a global state sequence connects to the original initial global state. If there is a path, then the candidate global state is really an erroneous global state and the communication protocol does have some logical errors. Otherwise, if there is no candidate global state or none of the candidate global state has a path, then the communication protocol is error free.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":110496,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of TENCON '93. IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Computers, Communications and Automation","volume":"329 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of TENCON '93. IEEE Region 10 International Conference on Computers, Communications and Automation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TENCON.1993.320039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Using the formal Communication Finite State Machine (CFSM) model, a communication protocol consists of several communicating entities which can be represented in some CFSMs. Global state reachability analysis is one of the most straightforward ways to automatically detect logical errors in a communication protocol specified in the CFSM model. Global state reachability analysis generates all of the reachable global states and checks the correctness one by one. Even though communication protocols are error free, global state reachability analysis still needs to be executed completely. We propose a new verification method which is called the backward protocol verification method, to detect logical errors. By analyzing the properties of deadlock error, unspecified reception error, and channel overflow error, some candidate erroneous global states are generated. Then, each candidate global state is checked whether there is a path, i.e., a global state sequence connects to the original initial global state. If there is a path, then the candidate global state is really an erroneous global state and the communication protocol does have some logical errors. Otherwise, if there is no candidate global state or none of the candidate global state has a path, then the communication protocol is error free.<>
一种反向协议验证方法
使用正式的通信有限状态机(CFSM)模型,通信协议由多个通信实体组成,这些通信实体可以用一些CFSM来表示。全局状态可达性分析是自动检测CFSM模型中指定的通信协议中的逻辑错误的最直接的方法之一。全局状态可达性分析生成所有可达的全局状态,并逐一检查其正确性。即使通信协议是无错误的,全局状态可达性分析仍然需要完全执行。为了检测逻辑错误,我们提出了一种新的验证方法——反向协议验证方法。通过分析死锁错误、未指定接收错误和通道溢出错误的特性,生成了一些候选的全局错误状态。然后,检查每个候选全局状态是否存在路径,即一个全局状态序列连接到原始初始全局状态。如果存在路径,那么候选全局状态实际上是一个错误的全局状态,并且通信协议确实存在一些逻辑错误。否则,如果没有候选全局状态或候选全局状态都没有路径,则通信协议是无错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信