Reflexões sobre o método em Keynes

Fernando Ferrari Filho, Fábio Henrique Bittes Terra
{"title":"Reflexões sobre o método em Keynes","authors":"Fernando Ferrari Filho, Fábio Henrique Bittes Terra","doi":"10.1590/0101-31572016V36N01A05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The question of method raises probably some of the most controversial discussions of the work of John Maynard Keynes. Briefly, the controversies fall into three main areas: (i) the unit of analysis, i.e., whether Keynes' economic theory is atomistic or organic; (ii) whether or not there is continuity in Keynes' philosophical foundations throughout his work; and (iii) speculation about the scientific method Keynes used. In that context, this paper aims to explore the latter of these lines of controversy. The idea is to show that, considering his insights related to the inductivism, mainly in the Treatise on Probability, there are evidences that Keynes' method was historical and inductive.","PeriodicalId":274789,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Economia Política","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Economia Política","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572016V36N01A05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The question of method raises probably some of the most controversial discussions of the work of John Maynard Keynes. Briefly, the controversies fall into three main areas: (i) the unit of analysis, i.e., whether Keynes' economic theory is atomistic or organic; (ii) whether or not there is continuity in Keynes' philosophical foundations throughout his work; and (iii) speculation about the scientific method Keynes used. In that context, this paper aims to explore the latter of these lines of controversy. The idea is to show that, considering his insights related to the inductivism, mainly in the Treatise on Probability, there are evidences that Keynes' method was historical and inductive.
对凯恩斯方法的反思
关于方法的问题,可能是约翰•梅纳德•凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes)著作中最具争议的讨论之一。简而言之,争议主要集中在三个方面:(i)分析单位,即凯恩斯的经济理论是原子论的还是有机的;(ii)凯恩斯的哲学基础在其著作中是否具有连续性;(三)对凯恩斯所使用的科学方法的推测。在此背景下,本文旨在探讨这些争议线的后者。这个想法是为了表明,考虑到他与归纳主义有关的见解,主要是在《概率论》中,有证据表明凯恩斯的方法是历史性的和归纳的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信