Servant Leadership: Influence of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment

Nikolina Vrcelj, Vuk Bevanda, Nevena Bevanda
{"title":"Servant Leadership: Influence of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment","authors":"Nikolina Vrcelj, Vuk Bevanda, Nevena Bevanda","doi":"10.7595/management.fon.2022.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research Question: The research objective of this study was to use empirical research to investigate the impact of servant leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Motivation: Despite the growing scholarly interest in servant leadership (Adiguzel, Ozcinar, & Karadal, 2020; Karatepe, Ozturk, & Terry Kim, 2019; Kozak, 2020), the area still lacks coherence and clarity. Although most improvements have been published in top-tier management journals, servant leadership research has also been published in other fields such as nursing, tourism, and education (Eva, Robin, Sendjaya, van Dierendonck, & Liden, 2019). These studies, however, are mainly focused on developed market economies whereas research in transition economies is limited. It is for this reason that we wanted to examine servant leadership and its relationship with job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the Republic of Serbia. Idea: Our main goal was to put the theory to the empirical test through known and validated questionnaires about whether servant leadership has a positive statistically significant impact on organizational commitment and whether servant leadership has a positive statistically significant effect on job satisfaction. Data: The quantitative data for the analysis were collected from February 5, 2020, until February 15, 2020, based on the results of a survey of 102 online participants. The basic sampling criterion was that the respondents were employed. Tools: Primary data were collected through a questionnaire. Servant leadership was measured by questionnaires compiled by Fields & Winston (2010) and Van Dierendonck & Nuijten (2011), job satisfaction was measured by an adjusted questionnaire developed by Spector (1994), and organizational commitment by a questionnaire developed by Mowday, Steers & Porter (1979). Descriptive statistics, correlation, and simple regression analysis were used in the data analysis. Findings: The results show the statistically significant positive impact of servant leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Moreover, servant leadership has a stronger impact on job satisfaction than on organizational commitment. The obtained research results are in the accordance with the results pointed out by Hamideh & Mahmood Zare (2012); West & Bocârnea (2008); Mohammad, Hussein, & Mohammad (2011); Ebener & O'Connell (2010); Hu & Liden (2011) and Liden, Wayne, Zhao, & Henderson (2008). Contribution: The results of the study may serve as guidance that organizations can use as inputs in the process of making future decisions and strategies in the human resource management (HRM) practice.","PeriodicalId":429254,"journal":{"name":"Management:Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management:Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7595/management.fon.2022.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research Question: The research objective of this study was to use empirical research to investigate the impact of servant leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Motivation: Despite the growing scholarly interest in servant leadership (Adiguzel, Ozcinar, & Karadal, 2020; Karatepe, Ozturk, & Terry Kim, 2019; Kozak, 2020), the area still lacks coherence and clarity. Although most improvements have been published in top-tier management journals, servant leadership research has also been published in other fields such as nursing, tourism, and education (Eva, Robin, Sendjaya, van Dierendonck, & Liden, 2019). These studies, however, are mainly focused on developed market economies whereas research in transition economies is limited. It is for this reason that we wanted to examine servant leadership and its relationship with job satisfaction and organizational commitment in the Republic of Serbia. Idea: Our main goal was to put the theory to the empirical test through known and validated questionnaires about whether servant leadership has a positive statistically significant impact on organizational commitment and whether servant leadership has a positive statistically significant effect on job satisfaction. Data: The quantitative data for the analysis were collected from February 5, 2020, until February 15, 2020, based on the results of a survey of 102 online participants. The basic sampling criterion was that the respondents were employed. Tools: Primary data were collected through a questionnaire. Servant leadership was measured by questionnaires compiled by Fields & Winston (2010) and Van Dierendonck & Nuijten (2011), job satisfaction was measured by an adjusted questionnaire developed by Spector (1994), and organizational commitment by a questionnaire developed by Mowday, Steers & Porter (1979). Descriptive statistics, correlation, and simple regression analysis were used in the data analysis. Findings: The results show the statistically significant positive impact of servant leadership on job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Moreover, servant leadership has a stronger impact on job satisfaction than on organizational commitment. The obtained research results are in the accordance with the results pointed out by Hamideh & Mahmood Zare (2012); West & Bocârnea (2008); Mohammad, Hussein, & Mohammad (2011); Ebener & O'Connell (2010); Hu & Liden (2011) and Liden, Wayne, Zhao, & Henderson (2008). Contribution: The results of the study may serve as guidance that organizations can use as inputs in the process of making future decisions and strategies in the human resource management (HRM) practice.
服务型领导:工作满意度与组织承诺的影响
研究问题:本研究的研究目的是运用实证研究的方法,探讨服务型领导对工作满意度和组织承诺的影响。动机:尽管学术界对仆人式领导越来越感兴趣(Adiguzel, Ozcinar, & Karadal, 2020;Karatepe, Ozturk, & Terry Kim, 2019;Kozak, 2020),该领域仍然缺乏连贯性和清晰度。尽管大多数改进都发表在顶级管理期刊上,但服务型领导研究也发表在护理、旅游和教育等其他领域(Eva, Robin, Sendjaya, van Dierendonck, & Liden, 2019)。然而,这些研究主要集中于发达市场经济,而对转型期经济的研究则很有限。正是出于这个原因,我们想要研究塞尔维亚共和国的仆人式领导及其与工作满意度和组织承诺的关系。想法:我们的主要目的是通过已知和有效的问卷调查,将理论应用于实证检验,以确定仆人式领导是否对组织承诺有积极的统计显著影响,以及仆人式领导是否对工作满意度有积极的统计显著影响。数据:用于分析的定量数据收集于2020年2月5日至2020年2月15日,基于对102名在线参与者的调查结果。基本的抽样标准是被调查者是受雇的。工具:通过问卷调查收集原始数据。仆人式领导由Fields & Winston(2010)和Van Dierendonck & Nuijten(2011)编制的问卷测量,工作满意度由Spector(1994)编制的调整问卷测量,组织承诺由moday, Steers & Porter(1979)编制的问卷测量。数据分析采用描述性统计、相关分析和简单回归分析。研究发现:服务型领导对工作满意度和组织承诺有显著的正向影响。此外,服务型领导对工作满意度的影响大于对组织承诺的影响。所得研究结果与Hamideh & Mahmood Zare(2012)所指出的结果一致;West & boc rnea (2008);Mohammad, Hussein, & Mohammad (2011);Ebener & O'Connell (2010);Hu & Liden(2011)和Liden, Wayne, Zhao, & Henderson(2008)。贡献:本研究的结果可以作为指导,组织可以在人力资源管理(HRM)实践中作为制定未来决策和战略过程的输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信