Fuzziness Detection in Thai Law Texts Using Deep Learning

Chatchawal Sangkeettrakarn, C. Haruechaiyasak, T. Theeramunkong
{"title":"Fuzziness Detection in Thai Law Texts Using Deep Learning","authors":"Chatchawal Sangkeettrakarn, C. Haruechaiyasak, T. Theeramunkong","doi":"10.1109/ICTEMSYS.2019.8695951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine understanding research aims to build machine intelligences. To make a machine understand, precise concepts are necessary. Numerous domains contain vague meanings when making decisions, such as a diagnosis or a legal interpretation. Once an artificial intelligence pretends to be human while dealing with imprecise data, a fuzziness in knowledges must be detected before constructing.This paper presents the methodology to detect a fuzziness in Thai law texts using a deep learning method. The experiments are designed to compare the performances of four well-known text classification methods, namely Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Convolutional Neural Network. The fuzziness in this study refers to an imprecise meaning in law texts which may be ambiguous when interpreted by a machine. We built a labelled corpus from four Thai Law codes namely 1) The Criminal Code 2) The Criminal Procedure Code 3) The Civil and Commercial Code and 4) The Civil Procedure Code. We proposed three conditions to identify the fuzziness, i.e. 1) a decision depends on a judge’s opinion 2) a decision that requires the production of evidence and 3) a decision which refers to other sections. The results of the experiment show that a Convolutional Neural Network significantly outperforms the others with 97.54% accuracy in comparison of all the dataset.","PeriodicalId":220516,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems (IC-ICTES)","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference of Information and Communication Technology for Embedded Systems (IC-ICTES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEMSYS.2019.8695951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Machine understanding research aims to build machine intelligences. To make a machine understand, precise concepts are necessary. Numerous domains contain vague meanings when making decisions, such as a diagnosis or a legal interpretation. Once an artificial intelligence pretends to be human while dealing with imprecise data, a fuzziness in knowledges must be detected before constructing.This paper presents the methodology to detect a fuzziness in Thai law texts using a deep learning method. The experiments are designed to compare the performances of four well-known text classification methods, namely Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, and Convolutional Neural Network. The fuzziness in this study refers to an imprecise meaning in law texts which may be ambiguous when interpreted by a machine. We built a labelled corpus from four Thai Law codes namely 1) The Criminal Code 2) The Criminal Procedure Code 3) The Civil and Commercial Code and 4) The Civil Procedure Code. We proposed three conditions to identify the fuzziness, i.e. 1) a decision depends on a judge’s opinion 2) a decision that requires the production of evidence and 3) a decision which refers to other sections. The results of the experiment show that a Convolutional Neural Network significantly outperforms the others with 97.54% accuracy in comparison of all the dataset.
基于深度学习的泰国法律文本模糊检测
机器理解研究旨在构建机器智能。为了让机器理解,精确的概念是必要的。在做出决策时,许多领域包含模糊的含义,例如诊断或法律解释。一旦人工智能在处理不精确的数据时假装成人类,就必须在构建之前检测到知识中的模糊性。本文提出了使用深度学习方法检测泰国法律文本中的模糊性的方法。实验旨在比较四种知名的文本分类方法的性能,即决策树、随机森林、支持向量机和卷积神经网络。本研究中的模糊性是指法律文本中不精确的含义,在机器解释时可能会产生歧义。我们从四部泰国法典中建立了一个标记语料库,即1)《刑法》、2)《刑事诉讼法》、3)《民商法》和4)《民事诉讼法》。我们提出了三个条件来识别模糊性,即1)决定取决于法官的意见,2)决定需要出示证据,3)决定涉及其他章节。实验结果表明,在所有数据集的对比中,卷积神经网络的准确率达到97.54%,明显优于其他神经网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信