Laying Down the Ladder: A Typology of Public Participation in Australian Natural Resource Management

H. Ross, M. Buchy, W. Proctor
{"title":"Laying Down the Ladder: A Typology of Public Participation in Australian Natural Resource Management","authors":"H. Ross, M. Buchy, W. Proctor","doi":"10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most influential attempts to classify forms of public participation are based on the ‘ladder’ of public participation (after Arnstein 1969), which orders approaches from those in which government dominates decision-making to ones in which its power is shared equally with the public or communities. Such unidimensional classifications can no longer reflect the realities and complexities of role-sharing between governments, communities and other parties in natural resource management. Initiative may come from nongovernment sources, and other dimensions besides power are relevant in designing participatory processes. This article describes a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management, commissioned by Land and Water Australia as part of a comprehensive project to enhance the information base on participatory approaches in Australian natural resource management (Buchy, Ross and Proctor 2002). Besides power sharing, it incorporates differences in agency (which parties carry the initiative), tenure (the nature of the parties' control over the resources), the nature of the participants, the nature of the task, and its duration. The typology distinguishes forms of participation based on voluntary action such as stewardship groups, from formal collaborations between stakeholder groups, and other forms of environmental management. The typology is intended as a guide to those designing or participating in such processes. The types should be considered in terms of their suitability for different circumstances, not as a hierarchy of desirability. Further, effective participatory processes should be customised to suit their circumstances, and can combine aspects of different types successfully to achieve greater advantages than single types may offer.","PeriodicalId":425760,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"143","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14486563.2002.10648561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 143

Abstract

The most influential attempts to classify forms of public participation are based on the ‘ladder’ of public participation (after Arnstein 1969), which orders approaches from those in which government dominates decision-making to ones in which its power is shared equally with the public or communities. Such unidimensional classifications can no longer reflect the realities and complexities of role-sharing between governments, communities and other parties in natural resource management. Initiative may come from nongovernment sources, and other dimensions besides power are relevant in designing participatory processes. This article describes a typology of public participation in Australian natural resource management, commissioned by Land and Water Australia as part of a comprehensive project to enhance the information base on participatory approaches in Australian natural resource management (Buchy, Ross and Proctor 2002). Besides power sharing, it incorporates differences in agency (which parties carry the initiative), tenure (the nature of the parties' control over the resources), the nature of the participants, the nature of the task, and its duration. The typology distinguishes forms of participation based on voluntary action such as stewardship groups, from formal collaborations between stakeholder groups, and other forms of environmental management. The typology is intended as a guide to those designing or participating in such processes. The types should be considered in terms of their suitability for different circumstances, not as a hierarchy of desirability. Further, effective participatory processes should be customised to suit their circumstances, and can combine aspects of different types successfully to achieve greater advantages than single types may offer.
放下梯子:澳大利亚自然资源管理中公众参与的类型学
对公众参与形式进行分类的最具影响力的尝试是基于公众参与的“阶梯”(在Arnstein 1969年之后),它将政府主导决策的方法排序为与公众或社区平等分享权力的方法。这种单一性的分类已不能反映政府、社区和其他各方在自然资源管理方面分担作用的现实和复杂性。主动性可能来自非政府来源,在设计参与性过程中,除了权力之外,其他方面也与之相关。这篇文章描述了澳大利亚自然资源管理中公众参与的一种类型,由澳大利亚土地和水部委托,作为一个综合项目的一部分,以加强澳大利亚自然资源管理中参与式方法的信息库(Buchy, Ross and Proctor 2002)。除了权力分享之外,它还包括代理(哪一方采取主动)、任期(各方对资源控制的性质)、参与者的性质、任务的性质及其持续时间的差异。该类型学区分了基于自愿行动的参与形式,如管理团体,与利益相关者团体之间的正式合作以及其他形式的环境管理。该类型学旨在为那些设计或参与此类过程的人提供指导。这些类型应该根据它们对不同环境的适用性来考虑,而不是按照可取性的等级来考虑。此外,有效的参与性进程应根据其具体情况进行调整,并能成功地将不同类型的方面结合起来,以取得比单一类型所能提供的更大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信