Dietitians’ Requirements and Self-evaluation of Knowledge and Attitude for Educational Program Development of Sustainability Management at School Foodservice

Na-Young Yi
{"title":"Dietitians’ Requirements and Self-evaluation of Knowledge and Attitude for Educational Program Development of Sustainability Management at School Foodservice","authors":"Na-Young Yi","doi":"10.21742/ijaner.2018.3.1.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purposes of the study were to identify dietitians’ requirements and self-evaluation of knowledge and attitude levels for sustainability management at school foodservice and compare the knowledge and attitude by general characteristics. Excluding responses with missing data, 187 responses were used for data analysis. The respondents were 38.5% in their 30s, 47.1% with 6 to 10 years of experience and 39.6% in elementary schools. In terms of knowledge, ‘facility and energy management (4.24)’ category received the highest perceived need score, followed by ‘procurement (4.07)’ and ‘waste management (4.04)’. The knowledge category that received the highest self evaluation was ‘procurement (3.59)’, while the category that received the lowest self-evaluation was ‘nutrition education (3.04)’. In terms of attitude, the highest perceived need was associated with ‘procurement (4.21)’, followed by ‘facility and energy management (4.14)’ and ‘waste management (4.08)’. The attitude category that received the highest self evaluation was ‘facility and energy management (3.88)’, while the category that received the lowest self-evaluation was ‘nutrition education (3.15)’. The dietitians’ requirements of knowledge and attitude scores were significantly higher than their self-evaluated knowledge and attitude scores in all job functional areas (p<0.001). In most areas, the needs and self-evaluation showed significant differences according to career, type of contract, and working school level. In all functional area, dietitians’ knowledge and attitude scores of elementary school were the highest (p<0.001).","PeriodicalId":185170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Education and Research","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advanced Nursing Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21742/ijaner.2018.3.1.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purposes of the study were to identify dietitians’ requirements and self-evaluation of knowledge and attitude levels for sustainability management at school foodservice and compare the knowledge and attitude by general characteristics. Excluding responses with missing data, 187 responses were used for data analysis. The respondents were 38.5% in their 30s, 47.1% with 6 to 10 years of experience and 39.6% in elementary schools. In terms of knowledge, ‘facility and energy management (4.24)’ category received the highest perceived need score, followed by ‘procurement (4.07)’ and ‘waste management (4.04)’. The knowledge category that received the highest self evaluation was ‘procurement (3.59)’, while the category that received the lowest self-evaluation was ‘nutrition education (3.04)’. In terms of attitude, the highest perceived need was associated with ‘procurement (4.21)’, followed by ‘facility and energy management (4.14)’ and ‘waste management (4.08)’. The attitude category that received the highest self evaluation was ‘facility and energy management (3.88)’, while the category that received the lowest self-evaluation was ‘nutrition education (3.15)’. The dietitians’ requirements of knowledge and attitude scores were significantly higher than their self-evaluated knowledge and attitude scores in all job functional areas (p<0.001). In most areas, the needs and self-evaluation showed significant differences according to career, type of contract, and working school level. In all functional area, dietitians’ knowledge and attitude scores of elementary school were the highest (p<0.001).
学校餐饮服务可持续管理教育项目开发中营养师的要求与知识态度自我评价
本研究旨在了解学校餐饮服务可持续性管理中营养学家对知识和态度水平的要求和自我评价,并比较其知识和态度的一般特征。剔除缺失数据的回复,187份回复用于数据分析。30多岁的占38.5%,6 ~ 10年工作经验的占47.1%,小学学历的占39.6%。在知识方面,“设施及能源管理”类别得分最高(4.24分),其次是“采购”(4.07分)和“废物管理”(4.04分)。知识类自我评价最高(3.59分),营养教育类自我评价最低(3.04分)。在态度方面,认为需求最高的是“采购”(4.21),其次是“设施及能源管理”(4.14)和“废物管理”(4.08)。自我评价最高的态度类别是“设施和能源管理”(3.88分),而自我评价最低的类别是“营养教育”(3.15分)。营养师对知识和态度得分的要求显著高于其在各工作职能领域的自评知识和态度得分(p<0.001)。在大多数地区,需求和自我评价在职业、合同类型和工作学校水平上存在显著差异。各功能区营养学家知识和态度得分均以小学阶段最高(p<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信