Prevalence And Risk Factors of Anxiety and Depression among University Students and Employees During Covid-19 Pandemic

Ruth Anne Claricel P. Batin, C.D.N.N.O. Obra, Chariss M. Macalma
{"title":"Prevalence And Risk Factors of Anxiety and Depression among University Students and Employees During Covid-19 Pandemic","authors":"Ruth Anne Claricel P. Batin, C.D.N.N.O. Obra, Chariss M. Macalma","doi":"10.46409/002.oyvf2653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To determine the prevalence and perceived risk factors of anxiety and depression among employees and students at the Mariano Marcos State University during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if significant differences exist between groups on the identified variables.\nMethod: This was a descriptive-comparative study that used a survey consisting of the screening questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Perceived Risk Factors of Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire (PRFAD). The developed, validated, and pilot-tested questionnaire was administered to 212 students and 114 employees during the second semester of 2020-2021. Descriptive statistics and T-test were used for analyses using p<0.05 as the significance level. \nResults: Results showed that most students have mild severity of anxiety and depression while employees have none to minimal. Cultural factors like the adverse working environment, social inequalities and exclusion, and adverse media influences were identified as moderate risk factors in anxiety and depression. Moreover, there were significant differences in the prevalence of anxiety and depression between students and employees and between teaching and non-teaching employees. There were higher self-reported anxiety and depression among students than employees and among teaching employees than non-teaching employees.\nConclusion and Implications: With a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression among students, higher education institutions must strengthen their student welfare services. Also, employees' mental health needs must be considered by providing services to alleviate their anxiety and depression. A holistic and comprehensive policy on mental health promotion should be implemented to improve the mental health status of students and employees.","PeriodicalId":156633,"journal":{"name":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philippine Journal of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46409/002.oyvf2653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To determine the prevalence and perceived risk factors of anxiety and depression among employees and students at the Mariano Marcos State University during the COVID-19 pandemic and determine if significant differences exist between groups on the identified variables. Method: This was a descriptive-comparative study that used a survey consisting of the screening questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), and Perceived Risk Factors of Anxiety and Depression Questionnaire (PRFAD). The developed, validated, and pilot-tested questionnaire was administered to 212 students and 114 employees during the second semester of 2020-2021. Descriptive statistics and T-test were used for analyses using p<0.05 as the significance level. Results: Results showed that most students have mild severity of anxiety and depression while employees have none to minimal. Cultural factors like the adverse working environment, social inequalities and exclusion, and adverse media influences were identified as moderate risk factors in anxiety and depression. Moreover, there were significant differences in the prevalence of anxiety and depression between students and employees and between teaching and non-teaching employees. There were higher self-reported anxiety and depression among students than employees and among teaching employees than non-teaching employees. Conclusion and Implications: With a higher prevalence of anxiety and depression among students, higher education institutions must strengthen their student welfare services. Also, employees' mental health needs must be considered by providing services to alleviate their anxiety and depression. A holistic and comprehensive policy on mental health promotion should be implemented to improve the mental health status of students and employees.
新冠肺炎大流行期间大学生和员工焦虑、抑郁的患病率及危险因素
目的:确定2019冠状病毒病大流行期间马里亚诺马科斯州立大学员工和学生焦虑和抑郁的患病率和感知风险因素,并确定组间在确定的变量上是否存在显著差异。方法:本研究是一项描述性比较研究,采用筛查问卷、患者健康问卷-9 (PHQ-9)、广泛性焦虑障碍问卷-7 (GAD-7)和焦虑抑郁感知危险因素问卷(PRFAD)组成的调查。在2020-2021年的第二学期,对212名学生和114名员工进行了开发、验证和试点测试的问卷调查。采用描述性统计和t检验,p<0.05为显著性水平。结果:结果显示,大多数学生都有轻微的焦虑和抑郁,而员工则没有。不利的工作环境、社会不平等和排斥以及不利的媒体影响等文化因素被确定为焦虑和抑郁的中等风险因素。此外,学生和员工、教师和非教师在焦虑和抑郁的患病率上存在显著差异。学生自我报告的焦虑和抑郁程度高于员工,教师高于非教师。结论与启示:大学生焦虑抑郁的普遍程度较高,高等院校必须加强学生福利服务。此外,必须考虑员工的心理健康需求,通过提供服务来减轻他们的焦虑和抑郁。应实施全面的心理健康促进政策,以改善学生和员工的心理健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信