How guided self-reflection improves critical thinking of nursing students in the pre-clinical stage?

Rona Cahyantari Merduaty, Aulia Addinillah Arum
{"title":"How guided self-reflection improves critical thinking of nursing students in the pre-clinical stage?","authors":"Rona Cahyantari Merduaty, Aulia Addinillah Arum","doi":"10.31603/nursing.v0i0.8876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-reflection has proven to improve clinical performance and support nursing students in formulating clinical reasoning. However, self-reflection is more commonly used during clinical placement. This study examines the effectiveness of guided self-reflection assignments in improving nursing students' critical thinking skills during practical learning at the academic stage. The research method used in this study is the single-subject experimental design by applying the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric (HCTSR) to assess the respondent's self-reflection after performing two procedures taught in the laboratory. Twelve nursing students participated in this study in August 2022. Visual analysis is used to analyze the student's critical thinking score trend. The study indicates that 7 of 12 nursing students perform a positive trend during the procedure by improving their HCTSR score each intervention day. In general, the visual analysis displays an increasing trend from a maximum score of 3 (solid critical thinking) in the first self-reflection to a maximum score of 4 (very-strong critical thinking) in the last self-reflection. Guided self-reflection assessment and feedback effectively improve the thinking skills of nursing students undergoing practical learning at the academic stage. Concise and contextual guiding questions in writing self-reflection, specific self-reflection assessment rubrics, and lecturer feedback should be essential aspects of every nursing learning process, both at the pre-clinical and clinical stages. \nKeywords: Self-reflection; nursing student; students' performance; critical thinking; nursing care","PeriodicalId":425433,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Holistic Nursing Science","volume":"40 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Holistic Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/nursing.v0i0.8876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-reflection has proven to improve clinical performance and support nursing students in formulating clinical reasoning. However, self-reflection is more commonly used during clinical placement. This study examines the effectiveness of guided self-reflection assignments in improving nursing students' critical thinking skills during practical learning at the academic stage. The research method used in this study is the single-subject experimental design by applying the Holistic Critical Thinking Scoring Rubric (HCTSR) to assess the respondent's self-reflection after performing two procedures taught in the laboratory. Twelve nursing students participated in this study in August 2022. Visual analysis is used to analyze the student's critical thinking score trend. The study indicates that 7 of 12 nursing students perform a positive trend during the procedure by improving their HCTSR score each intervention day. In general, the visual analysis displays an increasing trend from a maximum score of 3 (solid critical thinking) in the first self-reflection to a maximum score of 4 (very-strong critical thinking) in the last self-reflection. Guided self-reflection assessment and feedback effectively improve the thinking skills of nursing students undergoing practical learning at the academic stage. Concise and contextual guiding questions in writing self-reflection, specific self-reflection assessment rubrics, and lecturer feedback should be essential aspects of every nursing learning process, both at the pre-clinical and clinical stages. Keywords: Self-reflection; nursing student; students' performance; critical thinking; nursing care
导向性自我反思如何提高护生临床前阶段的批判性思维?
自我反思已被证明可以提高临床表现,并支持护理学生制定临床推理。然而,自我反思更常用于临床安置。本研究旨在探讨导向性自我反思作业对护生学术阶段实践学习中批判性思维能力的提升效果。本研究采用的研究方法是单受试者实验设计,采用整体批判性思维评分标准(HCTSR)来评估被调查者在完成实验室教授的两个程序后的自我反思。12名护生于2022年8月参与本研究。运用视觉分析法分析学生批判性思维的得分趋势。研究结果显示,12名护生中有7名护生在干预期间的HCTSR评分均有改善趋势。总的来说,视觉分析从第一次自省的最高3分(扎实的批判性思维)到最后一次自省的最高4分(非常强的批判性思维)呈上升趋势。导向性自我反思评估与反馈有效提高了护生学术阶段实践学习的思维能力。在写作自我反思、具体的自我反思评估准则和讲师反馈中,简明和情境性的指导问题应该是每个护理学习过程的基本方面,无论是在临床前还是临床阶段。关键词:自我反省;护理学生;学生的表现;批判性思维;护理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信