DIFFERENCES IN GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE CONTENTS OF NATURAL SCIENCES IN REGULAR TEXTBOOKS AND TEXTBOOKS FOR STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Saša A. Horvat, Tamara N. Rončević, Ivana Z. Bogdanović, Dušica D. Rodić
{"title":"DIFFERENCES IN GRAPHIC ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE CONTENTS OF NATURAL SCIENCES IN REGULAR TEXTBOOKS AND TEXTBOOKS FOR STUDENTS WITH SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA","authors":"Saša A. Horvat, Tamara N. Rončević, Ivana Z. Bogdanović, Dušica D. Rodić","doi":"10.33225/balticste/2023.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most important source of knowledge in primary school teaching is the textbook. This research aimed to determine the differences in graphic illustrations in the contents of natural sciences in a regular textbook and a textbook for children with special educational needs in the Republic of Serbia. As the number of subjects that deal with the contents of natural sciences for children with special educational needs is small, as well as the number of schools that implement this type of teaching, physics is taken as a subject, because the number of common topics is quite similar. The research aim was to analyze illustrations in selected physics textbooks for the 6th grade of primary education, by the criteria for dividing illustrations by types, for determining abstractness and relative representation of illustrations. In addition, a supplementary classification of illustrations was applied. The obtained results indicate that the number of illustrations concerning the number of words is higher in textbooks for children with special educational needs, as well as that the most represented are illustrations from everyday life and greater abstraction compared to regular textbooks. Since the physics textbook for children with disabilities is quite old, these results can be examined in practice among teachers and help future textbook authors to write the best quality textbook taking into account the needs of teachers and children with special educational needs. Keywords: image analysis, teaching physics, type of illustrations, special educational needs","PeriodicalId":388525,"journal":{"name":"SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND INNOVATIONS","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION: NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND INNOVATIONS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/balticste/2023.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The most important source of knowledge in primary school teaching is the textbook. This research aimed to determine the differences in graphic illustrations in the contents of natural sciences in a regular textbook and a textbook for children with special educational needs in the Republic of Serbia. As the number of subjects that deal with the contents of natural sciences for children with special educational needs is small, as well as the number of schools that implement this type of teaching, physics is taken as a subject, because the number of common topics is quite similar. The research aim was to analyze illustrations in selected physics textbooks for the 6th grade of primary education, by the criteria for dividing illustrations by types, for determining abstractness and relative representation of illustrations. In addition, a supplementary classification of illustrations was applied. The obtained results indicate that the number of illustrations concerning the number of words is higher in textbooks for children with special educational needs, as well as that the most represented are illustrations from everyday life and greater abstraction compared to regular textbooks. Since the physics textbook for children with disabilities is quite old, these results can be examined in practice among teachers and help future textbook authors to write the best quality textbook taking into account the needs of teachers and children with special educational needs. Keywords: image analysis, teaching physics, type of illustrations, special educational needs
塞尔维亚共和国普通教科书和有特殊教育需要的学生教科书中自然科学内容的图解差异
小学教学中最重要的知识来源是课本。这项研究的目的是确定塞尔维亚共和国普通教科书和有特殊教育需要的儿童教科书中自然科学内容的图解的差异。由于针对特殊教育需要儿童的自然科学内容的学科较少,实施这类教学的学校也较少,所以将物理作为一门学科,因为常见主题的数量相当。本研究的目的是对选定的小学六年级物理教材中的插图进行分析,以按类型划分插图的标准,确定插图的抽象性和相对代表性。此外,还对插图进行了补充分类。研究结果表明,特殊教育需要儿童教科书中与单词数量相关的插图数量较多,并且与普通教科书相比,日常生活中的插图数量最多,抽象程度更高。由于残疾儿童物理教材的使用时间较长,这些结果可以在教师中进行实践检验,帮助未来的教科书作者编写出考虑到教师和特殊教育需要儿童需求的高质量教科书。关键词:图像分析,教学物理,插图类型,特殊教育需求
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信