Geopolitical Models before the Decision on the EU Taxonomy

Petko Truhchev
{"title":"Geopolitical Models before the Decision on the EU Taxonomy","authors":"Petko Truhchev","doi":"10.37075/bjiep.2022.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The French Presidency (January-June, 2022) inherits some unresolved and contentious issues within the EU. Among them is energy transition. The paper examines the EU’s ambitions to become a leader in climate neutrality by analysing if the necessary natural resources could be provided in scale to meet end consumption without any economic shock. What is further analysed is the scientific opinion on why there is a political dispute between the leading economies in the EU over the so-called taxonomy – the classification of energy sources as climate neutral. As a leader in nuclear energy, the role of France during its presidency of the EU is to persuade the European Commission to include nuclear energy in the taxonomy. The lack of a clear-cut solution to the issue is sending mixed signals to investors and undermining confidence in the European Green Deal. As the EU’s most powerful nuclear lobbyist, France will also have to protect the interests of CEE countries where nuclear plants date back to the Soviet era. Outlined are the arguments on the key importance of nuclear power plant countries for energy security. In parallel with nuclear energy, there are discussions on recognizing natural gas as ‘green’. Given that Russia is the EU’s main supplier of raw materials, the question is whether its recognition will reduce investors’ risk and Europe’s dependence on Russian influence amid geopolitical tensions between Russia and NATO of which the EU is a major member. Being a low-emission energy source, natural gas is key to the successful green transition of member states on the path to climate neutrality within the 2050 deadline. Two leading hypotheses emerge: only one of the sources to be included in the taxonomy. Nuclear energy would provide EU countries more autonomy in planning and investing in the energy transition. Natural gas as an imported raw material, subject to market mechanisms and influenced by geopolitics, would jeopardize the energy transition and the security of the European energy system.","PeriodicalId":225817,"journal":{"name":"Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulgarian Journal of International Economics and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37075/bjiep.2022.1.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The French Presidency (January-June, 2022) inherits some unresolved and contentious issues within the EU. Among them is energy transition. The paper examines the EU’s ambitions to become a leader in climate neutrality by analysing if the necessary natural resources could be provided in scale to meet end consumption without any economic shock. What is further analysed is the scientific opinion on why there is a political dispute between the leading economies in the EU over the so-called taxonomy – the classification of energy sources as climate neutral. As a leader in nuclear energy, the role of France during its presidency of the EU is to persuade the European Commission to include nuclear energy in the taxonomy. The lack of a clear-cut solution to the issue is sending mixed signals to investors and undermining confidence in the European Green Deal. As the EU’s most powerful nuclear lobbyist, France will also have to protect the interests of CEE countries where nuclear plants date back to the Soviet era. Outlined are the arguments on the key importance of nuclear power plant countries for energy security. In parallel with nuclear energy, there are discussions on recognizing natural gas as ‘green’. Given that Russia is the EU’s main supplier of raw materials, the question is whether its recognition will reduce investors’ risk and Europe’s dependence on Russian influence amid geopolitical tensions between Russia and NATO of which the EU is a major member. Being a low-emission energy source, natural gas is key to the successful green transition of member states on the path to climate neutrality within the 2050 deadline. Two leading hypotheses emerge: only one of the sources to be included in the taxonomy. Nuclear energy would provide EU countries more autonomy in planning and investing in the energy transition. Natural gas as an imported raw material, subject to market mechanisms and influenced by geopolitics, would jeopardize the energy transition and the security of the European energy system.
欧盟分类决定前的地缘政治模式
法国轮值主席国(2022年1月至6月)继承了欧盟内部一些未解决和有争议的问题。其中之一就是能源转型。本文通过分析必要的自然资源是否能够在不造成任何经济冲击的情况下大规模提供以满足最终消费,考察了欧盟成为气候中和领导者的雄心。进一步分析的是科学观点,即为什么欧盟主要经济体之间在所谓的分类法(将能源分类为气候中性)上存在政治争议。作为核能领域的领导者,法国在担任欧盟轮值主席国期间的作用是说服欧盟委员会将核能纳入分类。这个问题缺乏明确的解决方案,向投资者发出了复杂的信号,削弱了对《欧洲绿色协议》的信心。作为欧盟最强大的核能说客,法国还必须保护中东欧国家的利益,这些国家的核电站可以追溯到苏联时代。概述了关于核电站国家对能源安全至关重要的论点。在核能的同时,也有关于承认天然气是“绿色”的讨论。考虑到俄罗斯是欧盟的主要原材料供应国,问题是,在俄罗斯与欧盟主要成员国北约(NATO)之间的地缘政治紧张局势中,承认俄罗斯的地位是否会降低投资者的风险,以及欧洲对俄罗斯影响力的依赖。作为一种低排放能源,天然气是成员国在2050年最后期限内成功实现气候中和的绿色转型的关键。两个主要的假设出现了:只有一个来源被包括在分类中。核能将为欧盟国家在能源转型的规划和投资方面提供更大的自主权。天然气作为一种进口原材料,受制于市场机制和地缘政治的影响,将危及欧洲能源转型和能源系统的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信