Doctrinal Contest I

Ryan Walter
{"title":"Doctrinal Contest I","authors":"Ryan Walter","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the doctrinal contest between Malthus and Ricardo regarding value. Ricardo’s notoriously challenging treatment of value in relation to quantities of labour allowed him to recast political economy around this problem and construe his predecessors and rivals—including Smith and Malthus—as doctrinally flawed. In this account of the science, correct theory concerning value was its keystone. Malthus responded to Ricardo by both denying the veracity of his doctrinal claims and by impugning the style of reasoning that had led Ricardo to take this view of the subject. Malthus also sought to deny Ricardo access to the authority of Smith by portraying the two thinkers as pursuing divergent systems. The key point that emerges from this contest is the doctrinal and unhistorical reading of Smith’s Wealth of Nations that Malthus and Ricardo established, a fate from which it has barely escaped today.","PeriodicalId":254139,"journal":{"name":"Before Method and Models","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Before Method and Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197603055.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the doctrinal contest between Malthus and Ricardo regarding value. Ricardo’s notoriously challenging treatment of value in relation to quantities of labour allowed him to recast political economy around this problem and construe his predecessors and rivals—including Smith and Malthus—as doctrinally flawed. In this account of the science, correct theory concerning value was its keystone. Malthus responded to Ricardo by both denying the veracity of his doctrinal claims and by impugning the style of reasoning that had led Ricardo to take this view of the subject. Malthus also sought to deny Ricardo access to the authority of Smith by portraying the two thinkers as pursuing divergent systems. The key point that emerges from this contest is the doctrinal and unhistorical reading of Smith’s Wealth of Nations that Malthus and Ricardo established, a fate from which it has barely escaped today.
教义竞赛一
本章考察马尔萨斯和李嘉图关于价值的理论争论。李嘉图对与劳动数量有关的价值的颇具挑战性的处理方法,使他得以围绕这个问题重新塑造政治经济学,并将他的前辈和对手——包括斯密和马尔萨斯——视为理论上有缺陷的。在这门科学的叙述中,正确的价值理论是其基石。马尔萨斯对李嘉图的回应是,既否认李嘉图教义主张的真实性,又抨击导致李嘉图对主体采取这种观点的推理方式。马尔萨斯还试图通过描绘两位思想家追求不同的体系来否认李嘉图接近斯密的权威。这场争论的关键点在于马尔萨斯和李嘉图对斯密《国富论》的教条主义和非历史解读,这种解读在今天几乎无法逃脱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信