Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy

T. M. Agonnoude, Sègbegnon David Houeto, Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou, Maxime Agbo, L. Béhanzin, C. Houehanou
{"title":"Professionalisation of Program Evaluation in Africa: An Imperative for Effectiveness and Accountability for Public Policy","authors":"T. M. Agonnoude, Sègbegnon David Houeto, Gbenoukpo Sebastien Zannou, Maxime Agbo, L. Béhanzin, C. Houehanou","doi":"10.11648/J.CAJPH.20210704.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Program evaluation is an applied science which importance for accountability, efficacy and effectiveness of public policies makes consensus among scientific researchers. So, in developed countries, especially North America’ ones, it is a professional domain with professional associations, standards of practices and development of tools nurturing and improving continuously practices. The goal of this paper is to show that in French speaking African countries, inexistence or bad functioning of a formal frame of exercise and development of the practice impede the evaluation findings to achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. In fact, in most African French-speaking countries like Benin, amateurism is standard gold. Program evaluation in this context is practiced by managers and technocratic civil servants for all sectors who, with their specific experience in their domain, think they were able to judge program in implementation. So, in these conditions of inexistence of formal training in evaluation and standards of practices, the evaluation practice is marked by defects like unrespect of evaluators ‘independence, the glaring conflict of interest, the low rate of evaluation findings utilization, and so one. This result is so evident in Benin because, we know the non-professionalization of a sensitive domain, like education in program evaluation, can lead to disastrous consequences. So, it is urgent that improving evaluation quality and credibility needs a setup of formal framework of practice with qualified trainings, continuous trainings and experiences sharing and to setup standards of practices. The contribution of the most developed program evaluation communities of North America especially those of Canada would bewelcome.","PeriodicalId":339086,"journal":{"name":"Central African Journal of Public Health","volume":"326 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central African Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.CAJPH.20210704.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Program evaluation is an applied science which importance for accountability, efficacy and effectiveness of public policies makes consensus among scientific researchers. So, in developed countries, especially North America’ ones, it is a professional domain with professional associations, standards of practices and development of tools nurturing and improving continuously practices. The goal of this paper is to show that in French speaking African countries, inexistence or bad functioning of a formal frame of exercise and development of the practice impede the evaluation findings to achieve maximum credibility and acceptance. In fact, in most African French-speaking countries like Benin, amateurism is standard gold. Program evaluation in this context is practiced by managers and technocratic civil servants for all sectors who, with their specific experience in their domain, think they were able to judge program in implementation. So, in these conditions of inexistence of formal training in evaluation and standards of practices, the evaluation practice is marked by defects like unrespect of evaluators ‘independence, the glaring conflict of interest, the low rate of evaluation findings utilization, and so one. This result is so evident in Benin because, we know the non-professionalization of a sensitive domain, like education in program evaluation, can lead to disastrous consequences. So, it is urgent that improving evaluation quality and credibility needs a setup of formal framework of practice with qualified trainings, continuous trainings and experiences sharing and to setup standards of practices. The contribution of the most developed program evaluation communities of North America especially those of Canada would bewelcome.
非洲项目评估专业化:公共政策有效性和问责制的必要条件
项目评估是一门应用科学,其对公共政策的问责性、有效性和有效性的重要性已成为科研人员的共识。因此,在发达国家,特别是北美国家,它是一个专业领域,有专业协会、实践标准和工具开发,不断培育和改进实践。本文的目的是表明,在讲法语的非洲国家,不存在或运作不良的正式框架的练习和实践的发展阻碍了评价结果达到最大的可信度和接受度。事实上,在大多数非洲法语国家,如贝宁,业余是标准的黄金。在这种情况下,所有部门的管理人员和技术官僚公务员都在进行方案评估,他们在自己的领域有具体的经验,认为他们能够在实施中判断方案。因此,在缺乏正式的评估培训和实践标准的情况下,评估实践存在着不尊重评估人员独立性、利益冲突突出、评估结果利用率低等缺陷。这一结果在贝宁是如此明显,因为我们知道,一个敏感领域的非专业化,如项目评估教育,可能会导致灾难性的后果。因此,提高评估质量和可信度,迫切需要建立正式的实践框架,通过合格的培训、持续的培训和经验分享,并制定实践标准。欢迎北美最发达的项目评估机构,特别是加拿大的项目评估机构作出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信