Counterparty Risk Reduction by the Optimal Netting of OTC Derivatives

D. O'Kane
{"title":"Counterparty Risk Reduction by the Optimal Netting of OTC Derivatives","authors":"D. O'Kane","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2529956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The netting of OTC derivatives trades, known as 'compression', reduces systemic risk in financial markets by minimising counterparty exposures between large financial institutions, in particular the large dealer banks. We present here a framework for compression in the OTC derivatives market for interest rate swaps. We minimise the total net counterparty exposure by partially or fully unwinding existing swap trades and determine the degree of compression obtained as a function of the number of trades, the number of participating parties and the number of risk constraints. We do this using both linear programming (LP) and quadratic programming (QP) approaches. We are able to separately quantify the benefit of bilateral and multilateral netting. We also compare the tendency of both LP and QP approaches to favour full unwinds of existing trades versus partial unwinds. We calculate the performance of both optimisation approaches by calculating their average reduction in counterparty risk by simulating over large numbers of randomly generated trade sets. We show that significant compression can be achieved, and find that LP approaches are preferable as they are generally computationally faster and produce solutions with more full unwinds than QP approaches.","PeriodicalId":177064,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Econometric Modeling: Derivatives (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2529956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The netting of OTC derivatives trades, known as 'compression', reduces systemic risk in financial markets by minimising counterparty exposures between large financial institutions, in particular the large dealer banks. We present here a framework for compression in the OTC derivatives market for interest rate swaps. We minimise the total net counterparty exposure by partially or fully unwinding existing swap trades and determine the degree of compression obtained as a function of the number of trades, the number of participating parties and the number of risk constraints. We do this using both linear programming (LP) and quadratic programming (QP) approaches. We are able to separately quantify the benefit of bilateral and multilateral netting. We also compare the tendency of both LP and QP approaches to favour full unwinds of existing trades versus partial unwinds. We calculate the performance of both optimisation approaches by calculating their average reduction in counterparty risk by simulating over large numbers of randomly generated trade sets. We show that significant compression can be achieved, and find that LP approaches are preferable as they are generally computationally faster and produce solutions with more full unwinds than QP approaches.
OTC衍生品的最优净值降低交易对手风险
场外衍生品交易的净额被称为“压缩”,通过最大限度地减少大型金融机构(特别是大型交易商银行)之间的交易对手敞口,降低了金融市场的系统性风险。我们在这里提出了一个压缩利率掉期场外衍生品市场的框架。我们通过部分或全部平仓现有掉期交易来最小化交易对手的净敞口,并确定交易数量、参与方数量和风险约束数量的函数所获得的压缩程度。我们使用线性规划(LP)和二次规划(QP)方法来做到这一点。我们能够分别量化双边和多边网络的好处。我们还比较了LP和QP方法倾向于完全解除现有交易与部分解除交易的趋势。我们通过模拟大量随机生成的交易集来计算交易对手风险的平均降低,从而计算两种优化方法的性能。我们证明了可以实现显著的压缩,并发现LP方法更可取,因为它们通常计算速度更快,并且比QP方法产生更完整的解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信