Brandon Xavier, C. Schammel, D. Schammel, S. Trocha, Eric Farnsworth, A. Devane
{"title":"DOTOTATE: Positive is not always NET","authors":"Brandon Xavier, C. Schammel, D. Schammel, S. Trocha, Eric Farnsworth, A. Devane","doi":"10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are increasing in incidence, and the use of 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT to specifically identify NET has aided with early diagnosis, with 83%-100% sensitivity. \nCase: Here, we present a case in which a suspected small bowel obstruction by CT was 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT avid in both the mass and adjacent nodes, suggestive of NET. However, the mass was not consistent with NET during surgical resection and the intra-operative frozen section revealed heterotopic pancreatic tissue and necrotic fat. Surgical resection would have been extensive and morbid; given the lack of a malignant diagnosis, it was aborted. \nDiscussion: A comprehensive literature review demonstrated few false positive lesions identified by 68Ga-DOTOTATE; most frequently lymph nodes, pancreas, and prostate. Our case is the only reported false positive in a necrotic lesion. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT imaging for NET in the global context and presentation of the patient.","PeriodicalId":178697,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging","volume":"255 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Diagnostic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ajdi.20230314010926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are increasing in incidence, and the use of 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT to specifically identify NET has aided with early diagnosis, with 83%-100% sensitivity.
Case: Here, we present a case in which a suspected small bowel obstruction by CT was 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT avid in both the mass and adjacent nodes, suggestive of NET. However, the mass was not consistent with NET during surgical resection and the intra-operative frozen section revealed heterotopic pancreatic tissue and necrotic fat. Surgical resection would have been extensive and morbid; given the lack of a malignant diagnosis, it was aborted.
Discussion: A comprehensive literature review demonstrated few false positive lesions identified by 68Ga-DOTOTATE; most frequently lymph nodes, pancreas, and prostate. Our case is the only reported false positive in a necrotic lesion. These cases highlight the importance of evaluating 68Ga-DOTOTATE PET/CT imaging for NET in the global context and presentation of the patient.