Urban Conservation in International Charters

R. Stoica
{"title":"Urban Conservation in International Charters","authors":"R. Stoica","doi":"10.35784/odk.2789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will present an analytical review of doctrinal texts that have been key for the shaping of integrated urban conservation practice internationally: from the Athens Charter to the Historic Urban Landscape Convention. \nThe 1931 Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments was published at the same time when the Congres Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne was summing up its controversial urbanist ideology in its own Charte d'Athènes of 1933. Whilst the Athens Charter focused on technical aspects of monument restoration, the preceding debate showed a raising interest in historic urban areas.  CIAM’s Charter too, despite including a section regarding historic urban areas, limited its recommendations to the protection of individual monuments or ensembles.  \nSubstantial research of historic centres in European countries preceded the first national legislations and international charters targeted specifically at urban areas in 1960s and 70s. Notably, the 1964 Venice International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites finally extended the concepts of restoration and rehabilitation of monuments to protected areas such as historical city centres, recommending expanded heritage protection legislation worldwide. European national legislations followed suit. In 1975, the European Architectural Heritage Year had seen also the first charter promoting the conservation of the historic built environment as a whole. \nHowever, by the end of the 20th century, despite a good number of further doctrinal texts being adopted internationally, and the publication of numerous books, articles and reports touching on the problematic of urban conservation, the paucity of theoretical and conceptual advance of this field remained evident. The delay in giving a sound theoretical structure to the field of urban conservation has been, quite understandably, due to the complexity of the urban environment and the ensuing difficulty of separating out the effects of different variables at work within it. \nCharters over the past three decades call for an integration of planning and urban conservation based on an appraisal of the historic urban fabric and its community, an approach which should eventually provide a more sustainable urban development. This means understanding and evaluating the significance of place, on one hand, and drawing out management implications for protecting this significance and identifying opportunities for change, on the other. The 2011 Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation goes some way to internationalise the theory and practice that has been developed so far predominantly within the European context. \nThere are many issues that have been raised through charters over the last hundred years, and many still need a proper theoretical framework that can allow them to be used in practice widely, beyond the places with strong heritage conservation traditions and legislations.","PeriodicalId":273645,"journal":{"name":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","volume":"206 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper will present an analytical review of doctrinal texts that have been key for the shaping of integrated urban conservation practice internationally: from the Athens Charter to the Historic Urban Landscape Convention. The 1931 Athens Charter for the Restoration of Historic Monuments was published at the same time when the Congres Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne was summing up its controversial urbanist ideology in its own Charte d'Athènes of 1933. Whilst the Athens Charter focused on technical aspects of monument restoration, the preceding debate showed a raising interest in historic urban areas.  CIAM’s Charter too, despite including a section regarding historic urban areas, limited its recommendations to the protection of individual monuments or ensembles.  Substantial research of historic centres in European countries preceded the first national legislations and international charters targeted specifically at urban areas in 1960s and 70s. Notably, the 1964 Venice International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites finally extended the concepts of restoration and rehabilitation of monuments to protected areas such as historical city centres, recommending expanded heritage protection legislation worldwide. European national legislations followed suit. In 1975, the European Architectural Heritage Year had seen also the first charter promoting the conservation of the historic built environment as a whole. However, by the end of the 20th century, despite a good number of further doctrinal texts being adopted internationally, and the publication of numerous books, articles and reports touching on the problematic of urban conservation, the paucity of theoretical and conceptual advance of this field remained evident. The delay in giving a sound theoretical structure to the field of urban conservation has been, quite understandably, due to the complexity of the urban environment and the ensuing difficulty of separating out the effects of different variables at work within it. Charters over the past three decades call for an integration of planning and urban conservation based on an appraisal of the historic urban fabric and its community, an approach which should eventually provide a more sustainable urban development. This means understanding and evaluating the significance of place, on one hand, and drawing out management implications for protecting this significance and identifying opportunities for change, on the other. The 2011 Historic Urban Landscape Recommendation goes some way to internationalise the theory and practice that has been developed so far predominantly within the European context. There are many issues that have been raised through charters over the last hundred years, and many still need a proper theoretical framework that can allow them to be used in practice widely, beyond the places with strong heritage conservation traditions and legislations.
国际宪章中的城市保护
本文将对从《雅典宪章》到《历史性城市景观公约》的理论文本进行分析性回顾,这些理论文本对国际上综合城市保护实践的形成至关重要。1931年《雅典历史遗迹修复宪章》出版的同时,国际现代建筑大会也在1933年的《雅典宪章》中总结了其有争议的城市主义意识形态。虽然《雅典宪章》侧重于古迹修复的技术方面,但之前的辩论显示出对历史城市地区的兴趣日益浓厚。CIAM的宪章也同样,尽管包括了一个关于历史城市地区的章节,但它的建议仅限于保护单个纪念碑或建筑群。在1960年代和1970年代制订专门针对城市地区的第一批国家立法和国际宪章之前,对欧洲各国历史中心进行了大量研究。值得注意的是,1964年《保护和修复古迹和遗址威尼斯国际宪章》最终将古迹的修复和修复概念扩展到历史城市中心等受保护区域,并建议扩大世界范围内的遗产保护立法。欧洲国家的立法也紧随其后。1975年,欧洲建筑遗产年也见证了第一份促进保护历史建筑环境的宪章。然而,到20世纪末,尽管国际上采用了大量的理论文本,出版了大量涉及城市保护问题的书籍、文章和报告,但这一领域的理论和概念进步仍然很明显。在给城市保护领域提供一个健全的理论结构方面的延迟是完全可以理解的,这是由于城市环境的复杂性,以及随后难以分离出在其中起作用的不同变量的影响。过去三十年的宪章呼吁在对历史城市结构及其社区进行评估的基础上,将规划和城市保护结合起来,这种方法最终将提供更可持续的城市发展。这意味着一方面要理解和评估地点的重要性,另一方面要绘制出保护这种重要性和识别变化机会的管理含义。2011年《历史城市景观建议书》在一定程度上推动了迄今为止主要在欧洲背景下发展起来的理论和实践的国际化。在过去的一百年里,通过宪章提出了许多问题,许多问题仍然需要一个适当的理论框架,使它们能够在实践中得到广泛的应用,而不是在有很强的遗产保护传统和立法的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信