Format Ulang Masa Depan Islam: Review atas Model Politik Pengetahuan pada Sunnī dan Shī‘Ī

M. H. Umam
{"title":"Format Ulang Masa Depan Islam: Review atas Model Politik Pengetahuan pada Sunnī dan Shī‘Ī","authors":"M. H. Umam","doi":"10.15642/teosofi.2016.6.2.516-540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how Sunnī and Shī‘ī Muslims develop knowledge politics in accordance with their unique thought environments. This research discovers tentative evidence that the Muslim political leadership model plays an important part in the dynamics of Muslim society by employing a qualitative literature method with a descriptive-argumentative approach. Normatively, Sunnis and Shiites are similar, yet historically, there are strategic disparities. The notions of wilāyat al-‘ulamā’ in Sunnī and wilāyat al-faqīh in Shī‘ī have the similar content in terms of the politics of knowledge in forming leadership standards, but they have different methodologies for gaining knowledge and abilities. This article confirms that there are no normative issues with Islamic leadership and Islamic politics. Differences in perspectives on Islamic politics exist only in the model of political knowledge and technical state competencies. Furthermore, the constructive achievements of Islamic politics arise only when the leader chooses scientific leadership. In the golden age of medieval Islamic civilization, for example, the politics of knowledge spawned the culture of knowledge. During the period, the political leadership was successful in developing a wide range of information goods and useful tools for the people.","PeriodicalId":174700,"journal":{"name":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"597 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2016.6.2.516-540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores how Sunnī and Shī‘ī Muslims develop knowledge politics in accordance with their unique thought environments. This research discovers tentative evidence that the Muslim political leadership model plays an important part in the dynamics of Muslim society by employing a qualitative literature method with a descriptive-argumentative approach. Normatively, Sunnis and Shiites are similar, yet historically, there are strategic disparities. The notions of wilāyat al-‘ulamā’ in Sunnī and wilāyat al-faqīh in Shī‘ī have the similar content in terms of the politics of knowledge in forming leadership standards, but they have different methodologies for gaining knowledge and abilities. This article confirms that there are no normative issues with Islamic leadership and Islamic politics. Differences in perspectives on Islamic politics exist only in the model of political knowledge and technical state competencies. Furthermore, the constructive achievements of Islamic politics arise only when the leader chooses scientific leadership. In the golden age of medieval Islamic civilization, for example, the politics of knowledge spawned the culture of knowledge. During the period, the political leadership was successful in developing a wide range of information goods and useful tools for the people.
本文探讨了逊、什穆斯林如何根据其独特的思想环境发展知识政治。本研究采用定性文献法和描述性论证方法,初步发现穆斯林政治领导模式在穆斯林社会动态中发挥重要作用的证据。从规范上讲,逊尼派和什叶派是相似的,但从历史上看,他们在战略上存在差异。《孙》中的wilāyat al- ' ulamā '和《什》中的wilāyat al- faq h在形成领导标准的知识政治方面具有相似的内容,但它们在获取知识和能力方面具有不同的方法。这篇文章证实,伊斯兰领导和伊斯兰政治不存在规范问题。伊斯兰政治观点的差异只存在于政治知识和技术国家能力的模型中。此外,伊斯兰政治的建设性成就只有在领导者选择科学的领导方式时才会出现。例如,在中世纪伊斯兰文明的黄金时代,知识的政治催生了知识的文化。在此期间,政治领导层成功地为人民开发了广泛的信息产品和有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信