Anxiety, Depression, and The Burden of Caring for Patients with Palliative NeedsProspective Longitudinal Study

{"title":"Anxiety, Depression, and The Burden of Caring for Patients with Palliative NeedsProspective Longitudinal Study","authors":"","doi":"10.33140/nabcc.02.01.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aims to measure the primary caregiver’s (PrC) anxiety, depression and burden of care and to identify the correlation between the outcomes. Material and Methods: This prospective observational longitudinal study assessed the burden of care for patients with palliative needs comparatively between two groups: caregivers of patients with cancer and caregivers of patients with non-malignant diseases. At the same time, the score of anxiety and depression of these caregivers was measured. The researcher used the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC) to measure the burden of care and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) to measure the anxiety and depression of primary caregivers. These questionnaires were applied at the initial moment (T0) and periodically for three months. If the patient died in this period, the caregivers were evaluated two months after the event. Statistical analysis used the Mann Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon test to compare the two groups and Pearson test to assess the correlation between burden and anxiety/ depression. Results: The burden assessment of caregivers for cancer patients showed a statistically significant increase over 3 months (p=0.001). At the initial moment (T0), a statistically significant difference is observed between the burden of the oncological group and the non-oncological one. The correlation between the caregiver's burden and anxiety/ depression was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The load had a direct and statistically significant impact on the PrC's psycho-emotional state, and there is a strong link between it and the caregiver's anxiety and sadness when caring for a palliative patient. From a practical point of view, it is important to early identify the burden of care and to know how the PrC is relating to it, as well as to assess his/her psycho-emotional state in order to act through appropriate and individualized interventions.","PeriodicalId":168335,"journal":{"name":"New Advances in Brain & Critical Care","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Advances in Brain & Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33140/nabcc.02.01.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to measure the primary caregiver’s (PrC) anxiety, depression and burden of care and to identify the correlation between the outcomes. Material and Methods: This prospective observational longitudinal study assessed the burden of care for patients with palliative needs comparatively between two groups: caregivers of patients with cancer and caregivers of patients with non-malignant diseases. At the same time, the score of anxiety and depression of these caregivers was measured. The researcher used the Burden Scale for Family Caregivers (BSFC) to measure the burden of care and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) to measure the anxiety and depression of primary caregivers. These questionnaires were applied at the initial moment (T0) and periodically for three months. If the patient died in this period, the caregivers were evaluated two months after the event. Statistical analysis used the Mann Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon test to compare the two groups and Pearson test to assess the correlation between burden and anxiety/ depression. Results: The burden assessment of caregivers for cancer patients showed a statistically significant increase over 3 months (p=0.001). At the initial moment (T0), a statistically significant difference is observed between the burden of the oncological group and the non-oncological one. The correlation between the caregiver's burden and anxiety/ depression was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Conclusions: The load had a direct and statistically significant impact on the PrC's psycho-emotional state, and there is a strong link between it and the caregiver's anxiety and sadness when caring for a palliative patient. From a practical point of view, it is important to early identify the burden of care and to know how the PrC is relating to it, as well as to assess his/her psycho-emotional state in order to act through appropriate and individualized interventions.
焦虑、抑郁和姑息治疗需求患者的护理负担:前瞻性纵向研究
目的:本研究旨在测量主要照顾者的焦虑、抑郁和照顾负担,并确定结果之间的相关性。材料与方法:本前瞻性观察性纵向研究比较了两组患者的护理负担:癌症患者的护理者和非恶性疾病患者的护理者。同时测量这些照顾者的焦虑和抑郁得分。研究者使用家庭照顾者负担量表(BSFC)测量照顾负担,使用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)测量主要照顾者的焦虑和抑郁。这些问卷在初始时刻(T0)进行,并定期进行三个月。如果患者在此期间死亡,则在事件发生两个月后对护理人员进行评估。统计分析采用Mann Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon检验对两组进行比较,Pearson检验评估负担与焦虑/抑郁之间的相关性。结果:癌症患者照护者的负担评估在3个月内有统计学意义的增加(p=0.001)。在初始时刻(T0),肿瘤组与非肿瘤组的负担差异有统计学意义。照顾者负担与焦虑/抑郁之间的相关性有统计学意义(p = 0.001)。结论:负荷对患者的心理情绪状态有直接和显著的影响,且负荷与护理人员在照顾姑息病人时的焦虑和悲伤之间有很强的联系。从实际的角度来看,重要的是尽早确定护理负担,并了解患者如何与之相关,以及评估患者的心理情绪状态,以便通过适当和个性化的干预措施采取行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信