Readiness of the Bicol University English Department for the Impact of K to 12 on Higher Education

M. Meneses
{"title":"Readiness of the Bicol University English Department for the Impact of K to 12 on Higher Education","authors":"M. Meneses","doi":"10.47789/burdj.mbtcbbgs.20182103.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With changes in the national educational landscape brought on by the implementation of the K to 12 Basic Education Program and the ASEAN’s move towards qualifications standardization among professionals, updating and improving existing curricula have been the way to go for higher education institutions in the country. Together with this comes the need to ensure that the faculty to implement the new curricula are ready to teach new subjects that will certainly be added. Using Hass and Parkay’s Model of Curriculum Design, this study looked into the readiness of faculty of Bicol University to implement the new CHED-prescribed AB English curriculum. Through a survey, document analysis, and a Focus Group Discussion (FGD), it determined the perceived level of readiness of the faculty to teach new subjects under the new curriculum and the actual level of readiness of the faculty to teach the said subjects, and it identified strategies that may be adopted to better prepare the English Department for this new curriculum. Findings revealed a discrepancy between perceived and actual readiness of the faculty, where members considered themselves ready, but their documents showing mismatches in educational preparation, teaching experience, and professional development. Training/retooling, full implementation of OBE, production of instructional materials that are K to 12–ready; adequate equipment and facilities; and immersion, apprenticeship, or fellowship abroad are the strategies identified to best prepare the faculty for the implementation of the new curriculum. Recommendations are immediate retooling and earning of appropriate postgraduate degrees, realignment of degrees and careful choice of seminars and trainings to be attended, and preparation of retooling/training package to factor in each individual faculty member in terms of interests and expertise based on the new subjects to be offered in the new CHED-prescribed AB English curriculum.","PeriodicalId":422131,"journal":{"name":"Bicol University Research and Development Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bicol University Research and Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47789/burdj.mbtcbbgs.20182103.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With changes in the national educational landscape brought on by the implementation of the K to 12 Basic Education Program and the ASEAN’s move towards qualifications standardization among professionals, updating and improving existing curricula have been the way to go for higher education institutions in the country. Together with this comes the need to ensure that the faculty to implement the new curricula are ready to teach new subjects that will certainly be added. Using Hass and Parkay’s Model of Curriculum Design, this study looked into the readiness of faculty of Bicol University to implement the new CHED-prescribed AB English curriculum. Through a survey, document analysis, and a Focus Group Discussion (FGD), it determined the perceived level of readiness of the faculty to teach new subjects under the new curriculum and the actual level of readiness of the faculty to teach the said subjects, and it identified strategies that may be adopted to better prepare the English Department for this new curriculum. Findings revealed a discrepancy between perceived and actual readiness of the faculty, where members considered themselves ready, but their documents showing mismatches in educational preparation, teaching experience, and professional development. Training/retooling, full implementation of OBE, production of instructional materials that are K to 12–ready; adequate equipment and facilities; and immersion, apprenticeship, or fellowship abroad are the strategies identified to best prepare the faculty for the implementation of the new curriculum. Recommendations are immediate retooling and earning of appropriate postgraduate degrees, realignment of degrees and careful choice of seminars and trainings to be attended, and preparation of retooling/training package to factor in each individual faculty member in terms of interests and expertise based on the new subjects to be offered in the new CHED-prescribed AB English curriculum.
比科尔大学英语系对K至12年级对高等教育影响的准备
随着K至12基础教育计划的实施以及东盟向专业人员资格标准化的转变,国家教育格局发生了变化,更新和改进现有课程已成为该国高等教育机构的必经之路。与此同时,还需要确保实施新课程的教师准备好教授肯定会增加的新科目。本研究采用Hass和Parkay的课程设计模型,调查了比科尔大学教师对实施新版幼儿教育协会规定的AB英语课程的准备情况。通过调查、文献分析和焦点小组讨论,确定了教师在新课程下教授新科目的感知准备水平和教师教授这些科目的实际准备水平,并确定了可以采取的策略,使英语系更好地为新课程做好准备。调查结果显示,教师的感知准备和实际准备之间存在差异,其中成员认为自己准备好了,但他们的文件显示在教育准备、教学经验和专业发展方面存在不匹配。培训/重组,全面实施OBE,制作适合幼儿园到12年级的教学材料;足够的设备和设施;而浸入式教学、学徒制或海外奖学金是为实施新课程的教师做好最好准备的策略。这些建议包括:立即重新培训和获得适当的研究生学位,重新调整学位,仔细选择要参加的研讨会和培训,以及根据新的幼儿教育中心规定的AB英语课程中提供的新科目,根据每位教师的兴趣和专业知识,准备重新培训/培训包。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信