Individual Employment, Household Employment and Risk of Poverty in the EU. A Decomposition Analysis

V. Corluy, F. Vandenbroucke
{"title":"Individual Employment, Household Employment and Risk of Poverty in the EU. A Decomposition Analysis","authors":"V. Corluy, F. Vandenbroucke","doi":"10.2785/41846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we explore missing links between employment policy success (or failure) and inclusion policy success (or failure), relying on the EU Labour Force Survey (EU LFS) and the EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU SILC). At the inclusion side of the equation, our focus is on the share of individuals at risk of poverty in the 20-to-59 age cohort. The analysis proceeds in two steps. The first step considers the distribution of individual jobs over households, thus establishing a link between individual employment rates and household employment rates. Following the work by Gregg, Scutella and Wadsworth a ‘polarization index’ is defined in terms of the difference between, on the one hand, the hypothetical share of individuals living in jobless households assuming that individual employment is distributed randomly across households, and, on the other, the actual share of individuals living in jobless households. Actual changes in household joblessness are decomposed in (i) changes due to changes in polarization and (ii) changes due to changing individual employment rates and changing household structures. The second step in the analysis decomposes changes in the at-risk-of-poverty rates on the basis of (i) changes in the poverty risks of jobless households, and (ii) changes in the poverty risks of other (non-jobless) households; (iii) changes in household joblessness due to changes in individual employment rates and changing household structures (changes one would expect if no changes in polarization would occur) and (iv) changes in polarization. The proposed technique does yield interesting insights into the trajectories that EU welfare states have followed over the past ten years.","PeriodicalId":289235,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Econometric Studies of Labor Markets & Household Behavior (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Econometric Studies of Labor Markets & Household Behavior (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2785/41846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

In this paper we explore missing links between employment policy success (or failure) and inclusion policy success (or failure), relying on the EU Labour Force Survey (EU LFS) and the EU Survey on Income and Living Conditions (EU SILC). At the inclusion side of the equation, our focus is on the share of individuals at risk of poverty in the 20-to-59 age cohort. The analysis proceeds in two steps. The first step considers the distribution of individual jobs over households, thus establishing a link between individual employment rates and household employment rates. Following the work by Gregg, Scutella and Wadsworth a ‘polarization index’ is defined in terms of the difference between, on the one hand, the hypothetical share of individuals living in jobless households assuming that individual employment is distributed randomly across households, and, on the other, the actual share of individuals living in jobless households. Actual changes in household joblessness are decomposed in (i) changes due to changes in polarization and (ii) changes due to changing individual employment rates and changing household structures. The second step in the analysis decomposes changes in the at-risk-of-poverty rates on the basis of (i) changes in the poverty risks of jobless households, and (ii) changes in the poverty risks of other (non-jobless) households; (iii) changes in household joblessness due to changes in individual employment rates and changing household structures (changes one would expect if no changes in polarization would occur) and (iv) changes in polarization. The proposed technique does yield interesting insights into the trajectories that EU welfare states have followed over the past ten years.
欧盟的个人就业、家庭就业与贫困风险。A分解分析
本文以欧盟劳动力调查(EU LFS)和欧盟收入和生活条件调查(EU SILC)为依据,探讨了就业政策成功(或失败)与包容政策成功(或失败)之间缺失的联系。在包容性方面,我们关注的是20至59岁年龄组中有贫困风险的个人所占比例。分析分两个步骤进行。第一步考虑个人工作在家庭中的分配,从而建立个人就业率和家庭就业率之间的联系。根据Gregg、Scutella和Wadsworth的研究,“极化index”是根据以下两方面的差异来定义的:一方面,假设个人就业在各个家庭中随机分布,生活在失业家庭中的个人的假设份额,另一方面,生活在失业家庭中的个人的实际份额。家庭失业的实际变化分为(i)两极分化变化引起的变化和(ii)个人就业率变化和家庭结构变化引起的变化。分析的第二步是根据(i)失业家庭的贫困风险变化和(ii)其他(非失业)家庭的贫困风险变化分解贫困风险率的变化;(三)由于个人就业率的变化和家庭结构的变化而引起的家庭失业的变化(如果两极分化不会发生变化,人们可以预期这种变化)和(四)两极分化的变化。所提出的技术确实对欧盟福利国家在过去十年中所遵循的轨迹产生了有趣的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信