An experimental comparison of cognitive versus traditional approaches to teaching the prepositions: in, on, at

Lidón Prades Yerves
{"title":"An experimental comparison of cognitive versus traditional approaches to teaching the prepositions: in, on, at","authors":"Lidón Prades Yerves","doi":"10.6035/FORUMRECERCA.2018.23.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When learning a new language, prepositions are as commonly used as they are difficult to master. In the Spanish learning context, the first and most common prepositions to be taught in Secondary Education are the units in, on, at. However, the fact that the teaching of these prepositions comes at an early stage does not mean that they are easy to learn. In fact, teaching materials have typically assumed that prepositions are used in a non-systematic way, thus dealing with them from a collocational perspective. Against that position, research in the field of Cognitive Linguistics (henceforth CL) has demonstrated that only a small minority of prepositional uses are thoroughly idiomatic. According to this discipline, there exist two positions in relation to prepositional meaning, namely monosemy and polysemy. Following the latter perspective, Navarro i Ferrando (1998) has developed a theoretical model in which the meanings of the prepositions in, on and at can be described by radial networks containing spatial, force-dynamic and functional semantic elements. In the present study, the effectiveness of this model in teaching the prepositions in, on, at has been tested. For this purpose, an experiment has been designed in which two groups of 4th-year ESO are taught the target prepositions following two different approaches: CL-based and traditional, respectively. Thus, it is hypothesised that, after the study, the group following the CL approach will present a higher improvement in their command of the target prepositions than the group taught by means of a traditional approach. The overall results obtained in the experiment corroborate the hypothesis stated above, thus proving the advantages that a field such as CL can offer to the sphere of language teaching. However, the results also suggest the necessity of further research that helps to understand the extent to which factors such as motivation can influence the success of this approach.","PeriodicalId":143593,"journal":{"name":"Fòrum de Recerca","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fòrum de Recerca","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6035/FORUMRECERCA.2018.23.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When learning a new language, prepositions are as commonly used as they are difficult to master. In the Spanish learning context, the first and most common prepositions to be taught in Secondary Education are the units in, on, at. However, the fact that the teaching of these prepositions comes at an early stage does not mean that they are easy to learn. In fact, teaching materials have typically assumed that prepositions are used in a non-systematic way, thus dealing with them from a collocational perspective. Against that position, research in the field of Cognitive Linguistics (henceforth CL) has demonstrated that only a small minority of prepositional uses are thoroughly idiomatic. According to this discipline, there exist two positions in relation to prepositional meaning, namely monosemy and polysemy. Following the latter perspective, Navarro i Ferrando (1998) has developed a theoretical model in which the meanings of the prepositions in, on and at can be described by radial networks containing spatial, force-dynamic and functional semantic elements. In the present study, the effectiveness of this model in teaching the prepositions in, on, at has been tested. For this purpose, an experiment has been designed in which two groups of 4th-year ESO are taught the target prepositions following two different approaches: CL-based and traditional, respectively. Thus, it is hypothesised that, after the study, the group following the CL approach will present a higher improvement in their command of the target prepositions than the group taught by means of a traditional approach. The overall results obtained in the experiment corroborate the hypothesis stated above, thus proving the advantages that a field such as CL can offer to the sphere of language teaching. However, the results also suggest the necessity of further research that helps to understand the extent to which factors such as motivation can influence the success of this approach.
介词in, on, at的认知与传统教学方法的实验比较
在学习一门新语言时,介词既常用又难掌握。在西班牙语学习环境中,中学教育中教授的第一个也是最常见的介词是In, on, at的单位。然而,这些介词的早期教学并不意味着它们很容易学会。事实上,教材通常假定介词的使用方式是非系统的,因此从搭配的角度来处理介词。与这一观点相反,认知语言学(以下简称认知语言学)领域的研究表明,只有一小部分介词用法是完全习惯的。根据这一学科,介词的意义存在两种位置,即一义和多义。根据后一种观点,Navarro i Ferrando(1998)发展了一个理论模型,其中介词in、on和at的意义可以通过包含空间、力动态和功能语义元素的径向网络来描述。本研究对该模型在介词In、on、at教学中的有效性进行了测试。为此,设计了一项实验,对两组四年级学生分别采用两种不同的方法进行目标介词的教学:基于cl的和传统的。因此,我们假设,在研究之后,采用CL方法的小组在目标介词的掌握方面比采用传统方法的小组有更高的提高。实验得到的总体结果证实了上述假设,从而证明了语言学习等领域对语言教学领域的优势。然而,研究结果也表明,有必要进一步研究,以帮助理解动机等因素在多大程度上影响这种方法的成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信