Case Study For STI-LDNMOS Burned During HCI Stress to Passing Reliability Specifications

Wei-Cheng Chu, B. Tsai, H. Yoshida, Yi-Heng Chen, Yung-Lung Hsu
{"title":"Case Study For STI-LDNMOS Burned During HCI Stress to Passing Reliability Specifications","authors":"Wei-Cheng Chu, B. Tsai, H. Yoshida, Yi-Heng Chen, Yung-Lung Hsu","doi":"10.1109/IPFA55383.2022.9915705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ibmax (Maximum Substrate Current) of general LDNMOS has two peaks, one is located at Ndrift (N drift region) under Gox, far from the pinch-off point, while the other is close to the pinch-off point [1]. Considering the actual application of the component, we chose the first peak for HCI (Hot Carrier Injection) stress, and found that the 32V symmetry STI-LDNMOS (Shallow Trench Isolation Lateral Diffusion) on different platforms (A and B) seem to have different reasons for burning. The experimental data shows that the component burnout of platform A is similar to the papers published by the authors [2], that is, HCI stress will degrade the diode characteristics of drain to bulk, making the maximum electric field closer to the drain terminal and the kirk effect of IbVg worse. What's interesting is that during the HCI stress of the components on platform B, the measured IdVd, IbVd and IbVg do not have the signs of burning like those of platform A. In order to clarify the reason for its burning, we performed a series of experiments, and finally proved that it may originate from BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor) being turned on, not HCI induced TDDB (Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown). Finally, in order to save costs, we chose to change the process conditions of LDNH2 (Ndrift is near the channel) for reducing the implant energy and increasing the concentration to solve the burn-out problem and pass the criteria.","PeriodicalId":378702,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on the Physical and Failure Analysis of Integrated Circuits (IPFA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IPFA55383.2022.9915705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ibmax (Maximum Substrate Current) of general LDNMOS has two peaks, one is located at Ndrift (N drift region) under Gox, far from the pinch-off point, while the other is close to the pinch-off point [1]. Considering the actual application of the component, we chose the first peak for HCI (Hot Carrier Injection) stress, and found that the 32V symmetry STI-LDNMOS (Shallow Trench Isolation Lateral Diffusion) on different platforms (A and B) seem to have different reasons for burning. The experimental data shows that the component burnout of platform A is similar to the papers published by the authors [2], that is, HCI stress will degrade the diode characteristics of drain to bulk, making the maximum electric field closer to the drain terminal and the kirk effect of IbVg worse. What's interesting is that during the HCI stress of the components on platform B, the measured IdVd, IbVd and IbVg do not have the signs of burning like those of platform A. In order to clarify the reason for its burning, we performed a series of experiments, and finally proved that it may originate from BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor) being turned on, not HCI induced TDDB (Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown). Finally, in order to save costs, we chose to change the process conditions of LDNH2 (Ndrift is near the channel) for reducing the implant energy and increasing the concentration to solve the burn-out problem and pass the criteria.
在HCI应力下燃烧的STI-LDNMOS通过可靠性规范的案例研究
一般LDNMOS的Ibmax (Maximum Substrate Current)有两个峰,一个位于Gox下的Ndrift (N漂移区),远离掐断点,另一个靠近掐断点[1]。考虑到元件的实际应用,我们选择了HCI(热载流子注入)应力的第一个峰,发现不同平台(A和B)上的32V对称STI-LDNMOS(浅沟槽隔离横向扩散)似乎有不同的燃烧原因。实验数据显示,A平台的元器件燃尽与作者发表的论文相似[2],即HCI应力会使漏极二极管特性降为体积,使最大电场更靠近漏极端,IbVg的kirk效应变差。有趣的是,在B平台上元件的HCI应力过程中,测量到的IdVd、IbVd和IbVg没有像a平台那样有燃烧的迹象。为了阐明其燃烧的原因,我们进行了一系列的实验,最终证明它可能是由于BJT (Bipolar Junction Transistor)被接通,而不是HCI引起的TDDB (Time Dependent Dielectric Breakdown)。最后,为了节省成本,我们选择改变LDNH2的工艺条件(Ndrift靠近通道),降低植入体能量,增加浓度,解决烧尽问题,通过标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信