Unblocking the Sacred: New perspectives on the religious revival in South Eastern Europe

E. Saggau
{"title":"Unblocking the Sacred: New perspectives on the religious revival in South Eastern Europe","authors":"E. Saggau","doi":"10.20413/RASCEE.2018.11.1.39-55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A line of studies of contemporary religion in South East Europe links resurgent nationalism together with the revival of religion. These studies argue that nationalism are grounded on a re-use of religion and assumption of many former religious functions. This type of argument has become a key feature of social scientific studies of religion in the region, as already Daniela Kalkandjieva has pointed out in a 2011 study. In cases from Yugoslavia this argumentation and connection of religion and nationalism has blocked for a more nuanced description of the religious transformation of the religious communities in the period after the fall of communism. The local religious transformation of heritages, holy sites, communities and clergy are too often diminished and religion is instead interpreted to be “proxies”, “scenes” or “agents” for nationalism. The category of religion is emptied and nationalism seems to be all there is to say about religion. In this article it will be discussed what the danger are in such a simplification and, how it is possible to unblock the study of religion in the South East European context. This will be done through a critical revisiting of studies of religion in Montenegro and exemplified on some central cases from Montenegro. It is the intention of this article to craft a revised analytic strategy that on the one side keeps the attention on the connection between religion and nationalism, but at the same time acknowledge religion as a category in itself. Such an analytic frame can be used to nuance studies of religion in South East Europe.","PeriodicalId":161644,"journal":{"name":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and society in Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20413/RASCEE.2018.11.1.39-55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A line of studies of contemporary religion in South East Europe links resurgent nationalism together with the revival of religion. These studies argue that nationalism are grounded on a re-use of religion and assumption of many former religious functions. This type of argument has become a key feature of social scientific studies of religion in the region, as already Daniela Kalkandjieva has pointed out in a 2011 study. In cases from Yugoslavia this argumentation and connection of religion and nationalism has blocked for a more nuanced description of the religious transformation of the religious communities in the period after the fall of communism. The local religious transformation of heritages, holy sites, communities and clergy are too often diminished and religion is instead interpreted to be “proxies”, “scenes” or “agents” for nationalism. The category of religion is emptied and nationalism seems to be all there is to say about religion. In this article it will be discussed what the danger are in such a simplification and, how it is possible to unblock the study of religion in the South East European context. This will be done through a critical revisiting of studies of religion in Montenegro and exemplified on some central cases from Montenegro. It is the intention of this article to craft a revised analytic strategy that on the one side keeps the attention on the connection between religion and nationalism, but at the same time acknowledge religion as a category in itself. Such an analytic frame can be used to nuance studies of religion in South East Europe.
解禁神圣:东南欧宗教复兴的新视角
对东南欧当代宗教的一系列研究将民族主义的复兴与宗教的复兴联系在一起。这些研究认为,民族主义是基于对宗教的再利用和对许多以前的宗教功能的假设。正如Daniela Kalkandjieva在2011年的一项研究中指出的那样,这种类型的争论已经成为该地区宗教社会科学研究的一个关键特征。在南斯拉夫的情况下,宗教和民族主义的这种论证和联系阻碍了对共产主义垮台后宗教社区的宗教转变进行更细致入微的描述。当地对遗产、圣地、社区和神职人员的宗教改造往往被削弱,宗教反而被解释为民族主义的“代理人”、“场景”或“代理人”。宗教的范畴被清空,民族主义似乎是关于宗教的一切。在这篇文章中,我们将讨论这种简化的危险,以及如何在东南欧背景下解开宗教研究的障碍。这将通过批判性地重新审视黑山的宗教研究来完成,并以黑山的一些主要案例为例。本文试图构建一种修正后的分析策略,即一方面关注宗教与民族主义之间的联系,同时又承认宗教本身就是一个范畴。这样的分析框架可以用来对东南欧的宗教进行细致入微的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信