Profiling Energy Efficiency of Mobile Crowdsensing Data Collection Frameworks for Smart City Applications

M. Tomasoni, Andrea Capponi, Claudio Fiandrino, D. Kliazovich, F. Granelli, P. Bouvry
{"title":"Profiling Energy Efficiency of Mobile Crowdsensing Data Collection Frameworks for Smart City Applications","authors":"M. Tomasoni, Andrea Capponi, Claudio Fiandrino, D. Kliazovich, F. Granelli, P. Bouvry","doi":"10.1109/MobileCloud.2018.00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) has emerged in the last years and has become one of the most prominent paradigms for urban sensing. In MCS, citizens actively participate in the sensing process by contributing data with their smartphones, tablets, wearables and other mobile devices to a collector. As citizens sustain costs while contributing data, i.e., the energy spent from the batteries for sensing and reporting, devising energy efficient data collection frameworks (DCFs) is essential. In this work, we compare the energy efficiency of several DCFs through CrowdSenSim, which allows to perform large-scale simulation experiments in realistic urban environments. Specifically, the DCFs under analysis differ one with each other by the data reporting mechanism implemented and the signaling between users and the collector needed for sensing and reporting decisions. Results reveal that the key criterion differentiating DCFs’ energy consumption is the data reporting mechanism. In principle, continuous reporting to the collector should be more energy consuming than probabilistic reporting. However, DCFs with continuous reporting that implement mechanisms to block sensing and data delivery after a certain amount of contribution are more effective in harvesting data from the crowd.","PeriodicalId":193207,"journal":{"name":"2018 6th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering (MobileCloud)","volume":"92 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 6th IEEE International Conference on Mobile Cloud Computing, Services, and Engineering (MobileCloud)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MobileCloud.2018.00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Mobile crowdsensing (MCS) has emerged in the last years and has become one of the most prominent paradigms for urban sensing. In MCS, citizens actively participate in the sensing process by contributing data with their smartphones, tablets, wearables and other mobile devices to a collector. As citizens sustain costs while contributing data, i.e., the energy spent from the batteries for sensing and reporting, devising energy efficient data collection frameworks (DCFs) is essential. In this work, we compare the energy efficiency of several DCFs through CrowdSenSim, which allows to perform large-scale simulation experiments in realistic urban environments. Specifically, the DCFs under analysis differ one with each other by the data reporting mechanism implemented and the signaling between users and the collector needed for sensing and reporting decisions. Results reveal that the key criterion differentiating DCFs’ energy consumption is the data reporting mechanism. In principle, continuous reporting to the collector should be more energy consuming than probabilistic reporting. However, DCFs with continuous reporting that implement mechanisms to block sensing and data delivery after a certain amount of contribution are more effective in harvesting data from the crowd.
智能城市应用中移动众感数据收集框架的能效分析
移动群体感知(MCS)在过去几年中兴起,并已成为城市感知最突出的范例之一。在MCS中,市民通过智能手机、平板电脑、可穿戴设备和其他移动设备向收集器提供数据,积极参与传感过程。由于公民在提供数据(即用于传感和报告的电池消耗的能量)的同时承担成本,因此设计节能数据收集框架(dcf)至关重要。在这项工作中,我们通过CrowdSenSim比较了几种dcf的能源效率,这允许在现实的城市环境中进行大规模的模拟实验。具体来说,所分析的dcf之间的差异在于所实现的数据报告机制以及感知和报告决策所需的用户和收集器之间的信令。结果表明,区分dcf能耗的关键指标是数据报告机制。原则上,向收集器连续报告应该比概率报告消耗更多的能量。但是,具有连续报告功能的dcf在一定数量的贡献后实现阻止感知和数据传递的机制,可以更有效地从人群中收集数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书