Distributed Balancing of Wind Power Forecast Deviations by Intraday Trading and Internal Ex-ante Self-Balancing -- A Modelling Approach

Richard Scharff, M. Amelin
{"title":"Distributed Balancing of Wind Power Forecast Deviations by Intraday Trading and Internal Ex-ante Self-Balancing -- A Modelling Approach","authors":"Richard Scharff, M. Amelin","doi":"10.1109/DEXA.2013.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wind power generation does on the one hand contribute to a less polluting and more sustainable electric power generation mix. On the other hand, its power output is variable and subject to forecast errors. In real-time, deviations from wind power forecast are handled by the system operator. But expected deviations can already me minimised by power generating companies before real-time. Ways to decrease their expected deviations are intraday trading and/or re-scheduling of own power plants. Both can be regarded as forms of self-balancing before the period of delivery (ex-ante), intraday trading as a form of external ex-ante self-balancing and re-scheduling as internal ex-ante self-balancing. Both can decrease the need for real-time balancing by the system operator. As existing intraday markets are often plagued by low liquidity, it is important to model such not-perfectly liquid intraday markets and simulate different trading and scheduling strategies. This paper presents an approach to model the choice between purely internal self-balancing and internal self-balancing combined with intraday trading on a not fully liquid intraday market. Results from the model runs indicate that intraday trading on a not-perfectly liquid market can be beneficial from the producers as well as from the system's perspective. However, it can result in increased costs if the possibilities to trade on the intraday market are very limited. This is important to consider when investigating the question whether it would be beneficial to distribute a larger share of the balancing responsibility among the power generating companies in order to relieve some pressure from the system operator.","PeriodicalId":428515,"journal":{"name":"2013 24th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 24th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DEXA.2013.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Wind power generation does on the one hand contribute to a less polluting and more sustainable electric power generation mix. On the other hand, its power output is variable and subject to forecast errors. In real-time, deviations from wind power forecast are handled by the system operator. But expected deviations can already me minimised by power generating companies before real-time. Ways to decrease their expected deviations are intraday trading and/or re-scheduling of own power plants. Both can be regarded as forms of self-balancing before the period of delivery (ex-ante), intraday trading as a form of external ex-ante self-balancing and re-scheduling as internal ex-ante self-balancing. Both can decrease the need for real-time balancing by the system operator. As existing intraday markets are often plagued by low liquidity, it is important to model such not-perfectly liquid intraday markets and simulate different trading and scheduling strategies. This paper presents an approach to model the choice between purely internal self-balancing and internal self-balancing combined with intraday trading on a not fully liquid intraday market. Results from the model runs indicate that intraday trading on a not-perfectly liquid market can be beneficial from the producers as well as from the system's perspective. However, it can result in increased costs if the possibilities to trade on the intraday market are very limited. This is important to consider when investigating the question whether it would be beneficial to distribute a larger share of the balancing responsibility among the power generating companies in order to relieve some pressure from the system operator.
基于日内交易和事前内部自平衡的风电预测偏差分布式平衡——一种建模方法
一方面,风力发电确实有助于减少污染和更可持续的发电组合。另一方面,它的输出功率是可变的,容易受到预测误差的影响。在实时情况下,与风电预测的偏差由系统操作员处理。但发电公司已经可以在实时化之前将预期偏差最小化。减少预期偏差的方法是日内交易和/或重新安排自己的发电厂。两者都可以看作是交割期前的自平衡形式(事前),日内交易是一种外部事前自平衡形式,重新调度是一种内部事前自平衡形式。两者都可以减少系统操作员对实时平衡的需求。由于现有的盘中市场经常受到低流动性的困扰,因此对这种非完全流动性的盘中市场进行建模并模拟不同的交易和调度策略是很重要的。本文提出了在非完全流动的日内市场上,对纯内部自平衡与内部自平衡结合日内交易之间的选择进行建模的方法。模型运行的结果表明,从生产者和系统的角度来看,在非完全流动性的市场上进行日内交易是有益的。然而,如果在日内市场交易的可能性非常有限,则可能导致成本增加。在调查在发电公司之间分配更大份额的平衡责任以减轻来自系统运营商的压力是否有益时,这一点很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信