DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY)

Anna V. Taktarova, M. N. Cherkasova
{"title":"DYNAMICS OF AMBIVALENT ASSESSMENT OF THE HIGHER EDUCATIONAL PROCESS DURING COVID–19 (THE CASE OF THE STUDENT PRAGMALINGUISTIC SURVEY)","authors":"Anna V. Taktarova, M. N. Cherkasova","doi":"10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-3-183-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ambivalent nature of the higher educational process was clearly manifested during the COVID–19 pandemic. Such an organization of teaching process generates new cognitive learning model, thus being the relevance of this study. \nPurpose. It is aimed at identification of students’ verbal ambivalent behavior and function to the new learning format over two time periods in dynamics: 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The scientific novelty of the study is to establish students’ ambivalent assessment of the educational process in terms of COVID–19. This assessment was proved experimentally during the survey. \nMaterials and methods. Materials of research are written recorded responses received from students during pragmalinguistic survey at the university. The following research methods were used: survey, lexico-semantic, pragmalinguistic experiment, as well as quantitative and interpretive methods. \nResults. The pragmalinguistic survey gives a detailed analysis of appraisal vector over the two reference groups: the survey of the first period has changed significantly compared to the second period. All 167 respondents showed ambivalent reactions, the first group demonstrates positive-negative ambivalence, while the second group shows negative-positive ambivalence. Thus, the ambiguous, diametrically-opposed attitude of students to the educational reality from the ambivalence research approach was established.","PeriodicalId":288940,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2022-14-3-183-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ambivalent nature of the higher educational process was clearly manifested during the COVID–19 pandemic. Such an organization of teaching process generates new cognitive learning model, thus being the relevance of this study. Purpose. It is aimed at identification of students’ verbal ambivalent behavior and function to the new learning format over two time periods in dynamics: 2020-2021 and 2021-2022. The scientific novelty of the study is to establish students’ ambivalent assessment of the educational process in terms of COVID–19. This assessment was proved experimentally during the survey. Materials and methods. Materials of research are written recorded responses received from students during pragmalinguistic survey at the university. The following research methods were used: survey, lexico-semantic, pragmalinguistic experiment, as well as quantitative and interpretive methods. Results. The pragmalinguistic survey gives a detailed analysis of appraisal vector over the two reference groups: the survey of the first period has changed significantly compared to the second period. All 167 respondents showed ambivalent reactions, the first group demonstrates positive-negative ambivalence, while the second group shows negative-positive ambivalence. Thus, the ambiguous, diametrically-opposed attitude of students to the educational reality from the ambivalence research approach was established.
2019冠状病毒病期间高等教育过程的矛盾评价动态(以学生语用语言学调查为例)
高等教育过程的矛盾性质在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间得到了明确体现。这种对教学过程的组织产生了新的认知学习模式,这也是本研究的意义所在。目的。本研究旨在确定学生在2020-2021年和2021-2022年两个动态时间段内的言语矛盾行为和对新学习格式的功能。本研究的科学新颖之处在于建立学生对新冠肺炎教育过程的矛盾评价。这一评价在调查中得到了实验证明。材料和方法。研究材料是在大学语用语言学调查中收到的学生的书面回答。研究方法主要有:调查法、词汇语义法、语用语言学实验法、定量法和解释法。结果。语用语言学调查对两个参照组的评价向量进行了详细分析:第一期的调查与第二期相比发生了显著变化。167名被调查者均表现出矛盾心理反应,第一组表现为正-负矛盾心理,第二组表现为负-正矛盾心理。由此,从矛盾心理研究方法出发,确立了学生对教育现实的模棱两可、截然相反的态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信