Differences in Chemical Learning Outcomes That are Teached with Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning Using Lab Real Media on Subject of Solubility and Solubility Product

Gulmah Sugiharti, Zurma Nilam
{"title":"Differences in Chemical Learning Outcomes That are Teached with Problem Based Learning and Discovery Learning Using Lab Real Media on Subject of Solubility and Solubility Product","authors":"Gulmah Sugiharti, Zurma Nilam","doi":"10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is an experimental research that is able to find out whether there are differences in students' chemistry learning outcomes that teach with Problem Based Learning model (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) using Real Media Lab. In my experiments I was taught by PBL model with real lab and experiment II class with DL model using original lab. Data analysis uses two-t test. Expectation 1 class has an average pre and post test score of 51.5 + 7.27 and 77.12 + 8.90 with an average gain of 0.55. The experimental class II has a pre-test average of 43.1 + 6.65 and a post-test of 58.25 + 7.73 with an average gain of 0.26. Result of t test at α = 0,05 obtained tcount = 10,08> ttable = 2,0021 hence alternative hypothesis accepted, and concluded there are difference of learning result which significant between student taught by PBL model and DL model that is equal to 26%.","PeriodicalId":240056,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of The 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, AISTSSE 2018, 18-19 October 2018, Medan, Indonesia","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of The 5th Annual International Seminar on Trends in Science and Science Education, AISTSSE 2018, 18-19 October 2018, Medan, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-10-2018.2287343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is an experimental research that is able to find out whether there are differences in students' chemistry learning outcomes that teach with Problem Based Learning model (PBL) and Discovery Learning (DL) using Real Media Lab. In my experiments I was taught by PBL model with real lab and experiment II class with DL model using original lab. Data analysis uses two-t test. Expectation 1 class has an average pre and post test score of 51.5 + 7.27 and 77.12 + 8.90 with an average gain of 0.55. The experimental class II has a pre-test average of 43.1 + 6.65 and a post-test of 58.25 + 7.73 with an average gain of 0.26. Result of t test at α = 0,05 obtained tcount = 10,08> ttable = 2,0021 hence alternative hypothesis accepted, and concluded there are difference of learning result which significant between student taught by PBL model and DL model that is equal to 26%.
溶解度与溶解度积学科中基于问题的学习与基于实验室真实媒体的发现式学习在化学学习效果上的差异
本研究是一项实验研究,旨在探讨基于问题的学习模式(PBL)和基于发现的学习模式(DL)教学在学生化学学习成果上是否存在差异。在我的实验中,我采用PBL模型与真实实验室进行教学,实验II班采用DL模型与原始实验室进行教学。数据分析采用双t检验。期望1班平均前测和后测成绩分别为51.5 + 7.27和77.12 + 8.90,平均增益为0.55。实验二班前测平均值为43.1 + 6.65,后测平均值为58.25 + 7.73,平均增益为0.26。在α = 0.05处进行t检验,得到tcount = 10,08> ttable = 2,0021,因此接受择择假设,得出PBL模型与DL模型教学学生的学习结果有显著差异,差异达26%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信