Joint Information Warfare: An Information-Age Paradigm for Jointness

D. Kuehl
{"title":"Joint Information Warfare: An Information-Age Paradigm for Jointness","authors":"D. Kuehl","doi":"10.21236/ADA385599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conclusions * Current concepts of \"jointness\" that focus on integrating the operations of DOD's four military Services are too narrow for Information Warfare and Information Operations (IW/IO). * National information power and the broad needs of national security in the dynamics of the information age necessitate a more inclusive understanding of what is meant by \"joint\". * \"Joint IW/IO\" must incorporate the actions and involvement of numerous non-DOD organizations and activities, to include elements of the private sector. Although their actions will not be directed by DOD, active elements in Joint IW/IO must at least coordinate their actions, even if that coordination is informal, in order to be effective. * This concept of \"Joint IW/IO\" should be reflected in DOD policy and military doctrines Jointness and the Information Age The passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 generated a new emphasis on \"jointness\". Current concepts of jointness and joint operations are defined as \"activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one Service [emphasis added] of the same nation participate.\" The blending of the operations and capabilities of the military Services, however, is no longer sufficient for information warfare/information operations (IW/IO) and the needs of national security in the information age. The impacts and implications of the information revolution are so widespread that they necessitate a broader, more inclusive concept incorporating all of the various elements of national information power. The Services and Information Warfare All of the Services are responding in some manner to the challenges of the information age and the imperatives of information warfare. The Marines, while uncertain about the broader theories of IW, are deeply involved in exploring the means by which they can attain \"command dominance\" over their adversaries. While acknowledging and leveraging the recent dramatic technological advances in information and communication systems, the Marines' focus is clearly on the human dimension of conflict, with the objective of maximizing human and operational flexibility instead of relying on technology to minimize friction. The Army, also cautious about the broader theories of IO, has no such qualms about the technological opportunities of the future, and the Army's vision for the next century, incorporated in \"Force XXI\" and based on digitization of the battlefield, is heavily, perhaps critically, dependent on the technologies of the information age. The Army is investigating the means and implications of these concepts and capabilities, and its Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA), located at Fort Belvoir and associated with its Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), is one of the Army's focal points for this effort. Another is its Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) at Fort Monroe, which recently issued the Army's first doctrinal manual in this area, Field Manual (FM) 100-6, \"Information Operations.\" (The exact meaning of \"information operations\" varies according to the user, and while the term is used by DOD, the Army, and the Air Force, it means something different to all three.) The Navy has possibly more personnel engaged in \"nuts and bolts\" IW/IO than any other Service and has (perhaps more than any other Service) for decades practiced some of the elements of Command and Control Warfare (C2W), defined as \"the military strategy that implements information warfare on the battlefield.\" While still exploring the broader ramifications of IO, the Navy is exercising and practicing IW/C2W increasingly in its daily operations. While the Naval Information Warfare Activity (NIWA) at Fort Meade is a geographical reflection of the Navy's long history of cryptology, the Fleet Information Warfare Center (FIWC) at Little Creek Amphibious Base near Norfolk and Atlantic Fleet HQ, and its several branches around the country, are heavily involved in developing and refining concepts for fleet IW/C2W operations. …","PeriodicalId":165909,"journal":{"name":"National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Defense University. Institute for National Strategic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA385599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Conclusions * Current concepts of "jointness" that focus on integrating the operations of DOD's four military Services are too narrow for Information Warfare and Information Operations (IW/IO). * National information power and the broad needs of national security in the dynamics of the information age necessitate a more inclusive understanding of what is meant by "joint". * "Joint IW/IO" must incorporate the actions and involvement of numerous non-DOD organizations and activities, to include elements of the private sector. Although their actions will not be directed by DOD, active elements in Joint IW/IO must at least coordinate their actions, even if that coordination is informal, in order to be effective. * This concept of "Joint IW/IO" should be reflected in DOD policy and military doctrines Jointness and the Information Age The passage of the Goldwater-Nichols Act in 1986 generated a new emphasis on "jointness". Current concepts of jointness and joint operations are defined as "activities, operations, organizations, etc., in which elements of more than one Service [emphasis added] of the same nation participate." The blending of the operations and capabilities of the military Services, however, is no longer sufficient for information warfare/information operations (IW/IO) and the needs of national security in the information age. The impacts and implications of the information revolution are so widespread that they necessitate a broader, more inclusive concept incorporating all of the various elements of national information power. The Services and Information Warfare All of the Services are responding in some manner to the challenges of the information age and the imperatives of information warfare. The Marines, while uncertain about the broader theories of IW, are deeply involved in exploring the means by which they can attain "command dominance" over their adversaries. While acknowledging and leveraging the recent dramatic technological advances in information and communication systems, the Marines' focus is clearly on the human dimension of conflict, with the objective of maximizing human and operational flexibility instead of relying on technology to minimize friction. The Army, also cautious about the broader theories of IO, has no such qualms about the technological opportunities of the future, and the Army's vision for the next century, incorporated in "Force XXI" and based on digitization of the battlefield, is heavily, perhaps critically, dependent on the technologies of the information age. The Army is investigating the means and implications of these concepts and capabilities, and its Land Information Warfare Activity (LIWA), located at Fort Belvoir and associated with its Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM), is one of the Army's focal points for this effort. Another is its Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) at Fort Monroe, which recently issued the Army's first doctrinal manual in this area, Field Manual (FM) 100-6, "Information Operations." (The exact meaning of "information operations" varies according to the user, and while the term is used by DOD, the Army, and the Air Force, it means something different to all three.) The Navy has possibly more personnel engaged in "nuts and bolts" IW/IO than any other Service and has (perhaps more than any other Service) for decades practiced some of the elements of Command and Control Warfare (C2W), defined as "the military strategy that implements information warfare on the battlefield." While still exploring the broader ramifications of IO, the Navy is exercising and practicing IW/C2W increasingly in its daily operations. While the Naval Information Warfare Activity (NIWA) at Fort Meade is a geographical reflection of the Navy's long history of cryptology, the Fleet Information Warfare Center (FIWC) at Little Creek Amphibious Base near Norfolk and Atlantic Fleet HQ, and its several branches around the country, are heavily involved in developing and refining concepts for fleet IW/C2W operations. …
联合信息战:联合作战的信息时代范式
*目前的“联合”概念侧重于整合国防部四个军种的作战,对于信息战和信息作战(IW/IO)来说过于狭隘。*在信息时代的动态变化中,国家信息力量和国家安全的广泛需求需要对“联合”的含义有更包容的理解。*“联合IW/IO”必须包括许多非国防部组织和活动的行动和参与,包括私营部门的要素。虽然他们的行动不会受到国防部的指挥,但联合信息战/IO中的活跃分子必须至少协调他们的行动,即使这种协调是非正式的,以达到有效。“联合战/战”的概念应反映在国防部的政策和军事学说中。联合与信息时代。1986年通过的《戈德华特-尼科尔斯法案》重新强调了“联合”。目前联合和联合行动的概念被定义为“同一国家的一个以上军种的要素参与的活动、行动、组织等”。然而,军事行动和能力的混合已经不足以满足信息战争/信息作战(IW/IO)和信息时代国家安全的需要。信息革命的影响和影响是如此广泛,以至于需要一个更广泛、更具包容性的概念,将国家信息力量的所有各种要素都纳入其中。各军种和信息战各军种都在以某种方式应对信息时代的挑战和信息战的必要性。海军陆战队虽然不确定更广泛的信息战理论,但他们正在深入探索能够获得对对手的“指挥优势”的方法。在承认并利用最近在信息和通信系统方面取得的巨大技术进步的同时,海军陆战队的重点显然是冲突中的人的方面,其目标是最大限度地提高人员和作战灵活性,而不是依靠技术来减少摩擦。陆军对更广泛的IO理论也持谨慎态度,对未来的技术机遇没有这样的疑虑,陆军对下个世纪的愿景,纳入“21世纪部队”,以战场数字化为基础,严重依赖于信息时代的技术。陆军正在调查这些概念和能力的手段和影响,其位于贝尔沃堡的陆地信息战活动(LIWA)与其情报和安全司令部(INSCOM)相关,是陆军这项工作的焦点之一。另一个是位于门罗堡的训练和条令司令部(TRADOC),该司令部最近发布了陆军在该领域的第一本条令手册,野战手册(FM) 100-6,“信息作战”。(“信息操作”的确切含义因用户而异,虽然国防部、陆军和空军都使用这个术语,但对这三者来说,它的含义有所不同。)海军可能比其他任何军种都有更多的人员从事“具体细节”的IW/IO,并且几十年来(可能比其他任何军种都多)实践了指挥与控制战(C2W)的一些要素,C2W被定义为“在战场上实施信息战的军事战略”。虽然仍在探索IO的更广泛影响,但海军正在越来越多地在其日常行动中行使和实践IW/C2W。虽然米德堡的海军信息战活动(NIWA)是海军悠久的密码学历史的地理反映,但位于诺福克附近的小溪两栖基地和大西洋舰队总部的舰队信息战中心(FIWC)及其在全国各地的几个分支机构,都在大力参与开发和完善舰队IW/C2W作战的概念。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信