Common practices for manual greenhouse gas sampling in rice production: a literature study on sampling modalities of the closed chamber method

B. Sander, R. Wassmann
{"title":"Common practices for manual greenhouse gas sampling in rice production: a literature study on sampling modalities of the closed chamber method","authors":"B. Sander, R. Wassmann","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2014.892807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rice production is a major source of global methane emissions and many studies have been conducted to quantify flux rates of methane alongside N2O emissions from rice fields. The closed chamber method with manual sampling is the conventional approach for determining greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates from rice fields. However, as of now, there is no commonly accepted standard for the measurement protocols, so that published studies encompass a variety of different modalities depending on the specific settings and labour limitations of a given study. This literature study comprises 155 peer-reviewed articles on manual GHG sampling with a static closed chamber as a basis to determine the most common practices of this method regarding the following features: (1) procedures (duration of chamber closure, number of gas samples per chamber closure and number of replicate chambers), (2) timing (number of samplings per day and time of day of sampling) and (3) intervals (between two consecutive sampling days).It has been found that some features show a high degree of uniformity among these studies, namely, the procedures. On the other hand, other features of the measuring protocol diverge widely (timing and intervals). Derived from these results, the following common practices (compiling features being applied in more than 66% of the studies that give information on the particular feature) have been identified: duration of chamber closure (30 minutes or less), number of gas samples per chamber closure (3 or 4), number of replicates (3), number of samplings per day (1 or 2), time of day of sampling (late morning) and interval (7 days or less).","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"40","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2014.892807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 40

Abstract

Rice production is a major source of global methane emissions and many studies have been conducted to quantify flux rates of methane alongside N2O emissions from rice fields. The closed chamber method with manual sampling is the conventional approach for determining greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rates from rice fields. However, as of now, there is no commonly accepted standard for the measurement protocols, so that published studies encompass a variety of different modalities depending on the specific settings and labour limitations of a given study. This literature study comprises 155 peer-reviewed articles on manual GHG sampling with a static closed chamber as a basis to determine the most common practices of this method regarding the following features: (1) procedures (duration of chamber closure, number of gas samples per chamber closure and number of replicate chambers), (2) timing (number of samplings per day and time of day of sampling) and (3) intervals (between two consecutive sampling days).It has been found that some features show a high degree of uniformity among these studies, namely, the procedures. On the other hand, other features of the measuring protocol diverge widely (timing and intervals). Derived from these results, the following common practices (compiling features being applied in more than 66% of the studies that give information on the particular feature) have been identified: duration of chamber closure (30 minutes or less), number of gas samples per chamber closure (3 or 4), number of replicates (3), number of samplings per day (1 or 2), time of day of sampling (late morning) and interval (7 days or less).
水稻生产中人工温室气体取样的一般做法:封闭室法取样方式的文献研究
水稻生产是全球甲烷排放的主要来源,已经进行了许多研究,以量化稻田中甲烷和一氧化二氮排放的通量。人工采样的密闭室法是测定稻田温室气体排放率的常规方法。然而,到目前为止,还没有普遍接受的测量方案标准,因此已发表的研究包括各种不同的模式,这取决于特定研究的具体环境和劳动力限制。本文献研究包括155篇同行评议的关于静态封闭室手动温室气体采样的文章,作为确定该方法最常见做法的基础,涉及以下特征:(1)程序(封闭室的持续时间,每次封闭室的气体样本数量和重复室的数量),(2)时间(每天采样的数量和采样的时间)和(3)间隔(连续两个采样日之间)。已经发现,在这些研究中,一些特征显示出高度的一致性,即程序。另一方面,测量协议的其他特征差异很大(时间和间隔)。根据这些结果,确定了以下常见做法(编译特征在66%以上提供特定特征信息的研究中得到应用):封闭室的持续时间(30分钟或更短),每次封闭室的气体样本数量(3或4),重复次数(3),每天采样次数(1或2),采样时间(上午晚些时候)和间隔(7天或更短)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信