Comparison between CT UROGRAPHY and MR UROGRAPHY in cases of Hematuria

MO Abdalatif, AS Tallat, Somaya Mareez
{"title":"Comparison between CT UROGRAPHY and MR UROGRAPHY in cases of Hematuria","authors":"MO Abdalatif, AS Tallat, Somaya Mareez","doi":"10.21608/fumj.2020.114331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hematuria is the presence of blood in the urine and may be macroscopic or microscopic. This study was conducted to assess the role of CT and MRI in evaluating causes of hematuria. This study was a cross-sectional observational hospital-based study including 50 cases of hemturia. It was carried out from March 2016 to June 2018 at Fayoum University Hospital and Fayoum General Hospital. Out of the 50 cases, 47 (94.0%) with variety of UT abnormalities were identified. Renal masses were the most abnormalities detected 19/47 (40.0%), followed by bladder masses15/47 (31.9%), urolithiasis 10/47 (21.3%) and renal injury 3/47(6.4%). No abnormalities were found in 3/50 (6%) of the patients with hematuria. This study revealed the following findings; Both CTU and MRU can detect stones, but CTU can also differentiate types of stones by measuring their denisities. Both CTU and MRU can diagnose urinary tract neoplasms, MRU is more useful in tissue discrimination, as MRU offers superior soft tissue resolution and CTU is more helpful in local staging.","PeriodicalId":436341,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2020.114331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hematuria is the presence of blood in the urine and may be macroscopic or microscopic. This study was conducted to assess the role of CT and MRI in evaluating causes of hematuria. This study was a cross-sectional observational hospital-based study including 50 cases of hemturia. It was carried out from March 2016 to June 2018 at Fayoum University Hospital and Fayoum General Hospital. Out of the 50 cases, 47 (94.0%) with variety of UT abnormalities were identified. Renal masses were the most abnormalities detected 19/47 (40.0%), followed by bladder masses15/47 (31.9%), urolithiasis 10/47 (21.3%) and renal injury 3/47(6.4%). No abnormalities were found in 3/50 (6%) of the patients with hematuria. This study revealed the following findings; Both CTU and MRU can detect stones, but CTU can also differentiate types of stones by measuring their denisities. Both CTU and MRU can diagnose urinary tract neoplasms, MRU is more useful in tissue discrimination, as MRU offers superior soft tissue resolution and CTU is more helpful in local staging.
CT尿路造影与MR尿路造影在血尿诊断中的比较
血尿是指尿液中有血,可见于肉眼或显微镜下。本研究旨在评估CT和MRI在评估血尿病因中的作用。本研究是一项以医院为基础的横断面观察性研究,包括50例血尿。该试验于2016年3月至2018年6月在法尤姆大学医院和法尤姆总医院进行。在50例病例中,47例(94.0%)发现各种UT异常。肾肿块最多(19/47)(40.0%),其次为膀胱肿块(15/47)(31.9%)、尿石症(10/47)(21.3%)和肾损伤(3/47)(6.4%)。3/50(6%)的血尿患者未见异常。这项研究揭示了以下发现:CTU和MRU都可以检测结石,但CTU还可以通过测量结石的密度来区分结石的类型。CTU和MRU都可以诊断尿路肿瘤,MRU在组织鉴别方面更有用,因为MRU提供了更好的软组织分辨率,而CTU在局部分期方面更有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信