Case study on the Competitiveness Comparisons of Karachi Port with the Neighbouring Emerging Ports in Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean.

{"title":"Case study on the Competitiveness Comparisons of Karachi Port with the Neighbouring Emerging Ports in Persian Gulf and Indian Ocean.","authors":"","doi":"10.37435/nbr-20-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: This study evaluates competitiveness of emerging ports located in the\nIndian Ocean and the Persian Gulf. Traditionally, ports operational efficacy is\nevaluated only on basis of throughput, a case in point being the Lloyds International\nPort ranking. However, we do not concur with this approach and adopt a multicriteria methodology.\nMethodology: Three criteria - throughput, physical infrastructure, and performance\nare used to assess the operational efficacy of the ports. TOPSIS augmented with the\n“entropy weight” is used to devise weights for the chosen criteria and overall\noperational efficacy for each port is calculated.\nResults: The study revealed that infrastructure plays a critical role in the overall\noperational efficacy of the port. Karachi port is behind the contemporary ports in the\nIndian Ocean and the Persian Gulf because of its inadequate infrastructure. The\nresults also highlighted that Jawaharlal Nehru Port ranked highest in considered\nports while Port of Mundra ranked the worst.\nPractical Implications: The study can provide an insight to the port users about the\ncompetitive advantage amongst ports. Moreover, it also identifies the areas that can\nbe improved for better efficiency.\nOriginality: The research article is novel because no similar study has been conducted\nspecifically on the ports in the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf.","PeriodicalId":264765,"journal":{"name":"NUST Business Review Volume 2 - Issue I Articles","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NUST Business Review Volume 2 - Issue I Articles","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37435/nbr-20-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates competitiveness of emerging ports located in the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf. Traditionally, ports operational efficacy is evaluated only on basis of throughput, a case in point being the Lloyds International Port ranking. However, we do not concur with this approach and adopt a multicriteria methodology. Methodology: Three criteria - throughput, physical infrastructure, and performance are used to assess the operational efficacy of the ports. TOPSIS augmented with the “entropy weight” is used to devise weights for the chosen criteria and overall operational efficacy for each port is calculated. Results: The study revealed that infrastructure plays a critical role in the overall operational efficacy of the port. Karachi port is behind the contemporary ports in the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf because of its inadequate infrastructure. The results also highlighted that Jawaharlal Nehru Port ranked highest in considered ports while Port of Mundra ranked the worst. Practical Implications: The study can provide an insight to the port users about the competitive advantage amongst ports. Moreover, it also identifies the areas that can be improved for better efficiency. Originality: The research article is novel because no similar study has been conducted specifically on the ports in the Indian Ocean and the Persian Gulf.
卡拉奇港与邻近波斯湾、印度洋新兴港口竞争力比较案例研究。
目的:本研究评估位于印度洋和波斯湾的新兴港口的竞争力。传统上,港口的运营效率仅根据吞吐量进行评估,劳埃德国际港口排名就是一个很好的例子。然而,我们不同意这种方法,并采用多标准的方法。方法:三个标准-吞吐量,物理基础设施和性能用于评估港口的运营效率。利用TOPSIS与“熵权”的增强来设计所选标准的权重,并计算每个端口的总体操作效率。结果:研究表明,基础设施在港口整体运营效能中起着至关重要的作用。由于基础设施不足,卡拉奇港落后于印度洋和波斯湾的现代港口。结果还强调,贾瓦哈拉尔尼赫鲁港在考虑的港口中排名最高,而蒙德拉港排名最差。实际意义:本研究可为港口使用者提供有关港口间竞争优势的见解。此外,它还确定了可以改进以提高效率的领域。原创性:这篇研究文章是新颖的,因为没有专门针对印度洋和波斯湾港口进行过类似的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信