The effect of paracetamol on the parasitological diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria

Mohamed Magzob, Ashraf Al Sammani, Ahmed Al Siddiq
{"title":"The effect of paracetamol on the parasitological diagnosis of Plasmodium falciparum malaria","authors":"Mohamed Magzob, Ashraf Al Sammani, Ahmed Al Siddiq","doi":"10.25259/gjhsr_9_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nUp until the present time, malaria represents an immense public health problem worldwide with a significant morbidity and mortality rate in many developing countries including Sudan. The use of antipyretics and analgesics in the settings of malaria has been a matter of contention over a vast period of time. Now, it is widely believed among the public and some health professionals in Sudan that the antipyretic and analgesic paracetamol disturbs the accuracy of the parasitological diagnosis of malaria. This study investigates the magnitude and effects of that belief through a descriptive study and examines the actual effect of paracetamol on the parasitological diagnosis of falciparum malaria through a clinical trial.\n\n\n\nThis is a conjoined study that includes a prospective and descriptive study and a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and parallel-group clinical trial. The descriptive study included 846 participants from various states in Sudan. The targeted study subjects were the public and health professionals and the study was conducted utilizing an online-based questionnaire. The clinical trial included 325 patients with uncomplicated falciparum attending two primary healthcare outpatient clinics in Gezira state, Sudan. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either placebo tablets or 500 mg of oral paracetamol after the first blood smear sample was taken. The second blood smear samples were taken 2 h after taking treatment. Parasite density estimation and other parasitological data were obtained from each sample before and after treatment.\n\n\n\nThe majority of the public thinks that paracetamol affects the parasitological diagnosis of malaria (76.21%, n = 330/433). Personal experience and family and friends were the most dominant information sources for the public (31.20% and 28.01% respectively), while scholarly articles were the most common source of information for the health professional group (45.03%, n = 186/413). No significant differences between the parasitological findings acquired before and after taking the treatments among both the paracetamol group (P = 0.22) and the placebo group (P = 0.12). The parasite density mean for the paracetamol group differed by 16.31 P/μL after taking paracetamol, while the placebo group parasite density mean differed by 15.34 P/μL. The treatments did not inflict impacts on the advanced microscopic features of Plasmodium falciparum blood smears.\n\n\n\nParacetamol does not affect the parasitological diagnosis of falciparum malaria.\n","PeriodicalId":369069,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/gjhsr_9_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Up until the present time, malaria represents an immense public health problem worldwide with a significant morbidity and mortality rate in many developing countries including Sudan. The use of antipyretics and analgesics in the settings of malaria has been a matter of contention over a vast period of time. Now, it is widely believed among the public and some health professionals in Sudan that the antipyretic and analgesic paracetamol disturbs the accuracy of the parasitological diagnosis of malaria. This study investigates the magnitude and effects of that belief through a descriptive study and examines the actual effect of paracetamol on the parasitological diagnosis of falciparum malaria through a clinical trial. This is a conjoined study that includes a prospective and descriptive study and a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, and parallel-group clinical trial. The descriptive study included 846 participants from various states in Sudan. The targeted study subjects were the public and health professionals and the study was conducted utilizing an online-based questionnaire. The clinical trial included 325 patients with uncomplicated falciparum attending two primary healthcare outpatient clinics in Gezira state, Sudan. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either placebo tablets or 500 mg of oral paracetamol after the first blood smear sample was taken. The second blood smear samples were taken 2 h after taking treatment. Parasite density estimation and other parasitological data were obtained from each sample before and after treatment. The majority of the public thinks that paracetamol affects the parasitological diagnosis of malaria (76.21%, n = 330/433). Personal experience and family and friends were the most dominant information sources for the public (31.20% and 28.01% respectively), while scholarly articles were the most common source of information for the health professional group (45.03%, n = 186/413). No significant differences between the parasitological findings acquired before and after taking the treatments among both the paracetamol group (P = 0.22) and the placebo group (P = 0.12). The parasite density mean for the paracetamol group differed by 16.31 P/μL after taking paracetamol, while the placebo group parasite density mean differed by 15.34 P/μL. The treatments did not inflict impacts on the advanced microscopic features of Plasmodium falciparum blood smears. Paracetamol does not affect the parasitological diagnosis of falciparum malaria.
对乙酰氨基酚在恶性疟原虫疟疾寄生虫学诊断中的作用
到目前为止,疟疾是全世界一个巨大的公共卫生问题,在包括苏丹在内的许多发展中国家发病率和死亡率很高。在疟疾的情况下使用退烧药和镇痛药一直是一个有争议的问题,在很长一段时间。现在,苏丹的公众和一些保健专业人员普遍认为,解热镇痛的扑热息痛干扰了疟疾寄生虫学诊断的准确性。本研究通过一项描述性研究调查了这种信念的程度和影响,并通过临床试验检验了扑热息痛对恶性疟疾寄生虫学诊断的实际效果。这是一项联合研究,包括一项前瞻性描述性研究和一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲、平行组临床试验。这项描述性研究包括来自苏丹各州的846名参与者。目标研究对象是公众和卫生专业人员,研究采用基于在线的调查问卷进行。该临床试验包括325名在苏丹Gezira州的两家初级卫生保健门诊就诊的无并发症恶性疟原虫患者。在第一次血液涂片取样后,患者被随机分配服用安慰剂片或口服500毫克扑热息痛。治疗2 h后取第二次血涂片。对每个样本进行处理前后的寄生虫密度估算和其他寄生虫学数据。大多数公众认为扑热息痛影响疟疾的寄生虫学诊断(76.21%,n = 330/433)。个人经历和家人朋友是公众最主要的信息来源(分别为31.20%和28.01%),而学术文章是卫生专业人群最常见的信息来源(45.03%,n = 186/413)。扑热息痛组与安慰剂组治疗前后的寄生虫学检查结果差异无统计学意义(P = 0.22)。扑热息痛组和安慰剂组的寄生虫密度差异分别为16.31 P/μL和15.34 P/μL。这些治疗对恶性疟原虫血液涂片的高级显微特征没有影响。对乙酰氨基酚不影响恶性疟疾的寄生虫学诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信