The Role of Imaging in Examining Neurological Disorders; Assessing Brain, Stroke, and Neurological Disorders Using CT and MRI Imaging

S. Shetewi, Bander S. Al Mutairi, Saeed M. Bafaraj
{"title":"The Role of Imaging in Examining Neurological Disorders; Assessing Brain, Stroke, and Neurological Disorders Using CT and MRI Imaging","authors":"S. Shetewi, Bander S. Al Mutairi, Saeed M. Bafaraj","doi":"10.4236/act.2020.91001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nNeurological disorder is identified as a severe cause of mortality among the \npatients. Given the severity of the disorder, various tools have been developed \nfor the effective scanning of the symptoms and causes. Objective: The study \nintends to compare the two advanced neuroimaging tools i.e. computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) \nfor assessing the patients of the possible brain, stroke, and neurological \ndisorders concern their neurological symptoms and signs. Method: The \nretrospective study was conducted and medical records of 151 patients were \nassessed statistically. Chi-square test was applied to the collected data. \nResults: The results of the study provided that multiple seizures (15.2%) \nserved as the major cause of examination, followed by a headache (9.9%), visual \ncomplaint (7.9%), single seizure (5.3%), gait abnormality (3.3%) and altered \nconsciousness (2.6%); whereas, speech difficulty remained low (1.3%). CT scan \nfindings of the patients reported parieto-temporal area and development of \nacute hypo densities as the prime concerns, where its results remained insignificant (0.29). Using \nMRI, unremarkable MRI was majorly reported, followed by lateralized to one side, \nstable MRI feature, bilateral symptoms, and ischemic disease. The results of \nMRI were significant (0.00). Conclusion: The study concludes that magnetic \nresonance imaging is more effective for the evaluation of the neurological disorders as \ncompared to CT scan.","PeriodicalId":407440,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Computed Tomography","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Computed Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/act.2020.91001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Neurological disorder is identified as a severe cause of mortality among the patients. Given the severity of the disorder, various tools have been developed for the effective scanning of the symptoms and causes. Objective: The study intends to compare the two advanced neuroimaging tools i.e. computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for assessing the patients of the possible brain, stroke, and neurological disorders concern their neurological symptoms and signs. Method: The retrospective study was conducted and medical records of 151 patients were assessed statistically. Chi-square test was applied to the collected data. Results: The results of the study provided that multiple seizures (15.2%) served as the major cause of examination, followed by a headache (9.9%), visual complaint (7.9%), single seizure (5.3%), gait abnormality (3.3%) and altered consciousness (2.6%); whereas, speech difficulty remained low (1.3%). CT scan findings of the patients reported parieto-temporal area and development of acute hypo densities as the prime concerns, where its results remained insignificant (0.29). Using MRI, unremarkable MRI was majorly reported, followed by lateralized to one side, stable MRI feature, bilateral symptoms, and ischemic disease. The results of MRI were significant (0.00). Conclusion: The study concludes that magnetic resonance imaging is more effective for the evaluation of the neurological disorders as compared to CT scan.
影像学在神经系统疾病检查中的作用使用CT和MRI成像评估脑、中风和神经系统疾病
背景:神经系统疾病被认为是患者死亡的一个严重原因。鉴于这种疾病的严重性,已经开发了各种工具来有效地扫描症状和原因。目的:本研究旨在比较计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)这两种先进的神经成像工具在评估可能的脑、脑卒中和神经系统疾病患者的神经症状和体征方面的作用。方法:采用回顾性研究方法,对151例患者的病历进行统计分析。对收集的资料进行卡方检验。结果:多次发作是检查的主要原因(15.2%),其次是头痛(9.9%)、视力不适(7.9%)、单次发作(5.3%)、步态异常(3.3%)和意识改变(2.6%);然而,言语困难仍然很低(1.3%)。患者的CT扫描结果显示,顶颞区和急性低密度的发展是主要关注的问题,其结果仍然不显著(0.29)。使用MRI,主要报告MRI不显著,其次是一侧,MRI特征稳定,双侧症状和缺血性疾病。MRI结果差异有统计学意义(0.00)。结论:与CT扫描相比,磁共振成像对神经系统疾病的诊断更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信