Globalized Values and Postcolonial Responses

H. Wasserman
{"title":"Globalized Values and Postcolonial Responses","authors":"H. Wasserman","doi":"10.1177/1748048506060116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globalization has had a far-reaching effect on media technologies worldwide. Concomitant with this global spread of media forms, liberal views of the media’s role in a democracy have been exported to countries outside the West. In scholarly debates, attempts are increasingly made to globalize media ethics on the basis of a search for universal ethics. However, reactions against western, liberal-democratic views of the media’s role in society in postcolonial African countries have indicated that the dominant liberal framework is not universally applicable. Against the background of attempts to globalize media ethics and in the light of African responses against liberal-democratic frameworks, this article provides an illustration of the tension between different normative frameworks in a postcolonial context. It takes the South African media environment as an example of how different normative media frameworks may collide. An overview is given of the development of normative media ethical frameworks during the first decade of democracy in South Africa, as part of the shift towards self-regulation that the media underwent after the era of oppressive state regulation. Against the background of the conflicts that have marked the media’s relationship with government during the first decade after apartheid, as well as critical debates about the media’s roles and responsibilities in a new democratic society marked by continued social polarization and material inequalities, the article argues that the current normative frameworks within which the media operate are in need of revision. The article suggests that such a revisionary project could draw on postcolonial theory in order to renegotiate the orthodox media ethical frameworks inherited from western societies and contextualize it within the current historical, (geo)political and cultural juncture in South Africa. In the debate about global media ethics, this revision of South African normative media frameworks may then serve as an example of how western media ethics should be adapted to local contexts.","PeriodicalId":191414,"journal":{"name":"The International Communication Gazette","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Communication Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048506060116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

Abstract

Globalization has had a far-reaching effect on media technologies worldwide. Concomitant with this global spread of media forms, liberal views of the media’s role in a democracy have been exported to countries outside the West. In scholarly debates, attempts are increasingly made to globalize media ethics on the basis of a search for universal ethics. However, reactions against western, liberal-democratic views of the media’s role in society in postcolonial African countries have indicated that the dominant liberal framework is not universally applicable. Against the background of attempts to globalize media ethics and in the light of African responses against liberal-democratic frameworks, this article provides an illustration of the tension between different normative frameworks in a postcolonial context. It takes the South African media environment as an example of how different normative media frameworks may collide. An overview is given of the development of normative media ethical frameworks during the first decade of democracy in South Africa, as part of the shift towards self-regulation that the media underwent after the era of oppressive state regulation. Against the background of the conflicts that have marked the media’s relationship with government during the first decade after apartheid, as well as critical debates about the media’s roles and responsibilities in a new democratic society marked by continued social polarization and material inequalities, the article argues that the current normative frameworks within which the media operate are in need of revision. The article suggests that such a revisionary project could draw on postcolonial theory in order to renegotiate the orthodox media ethical frameworks inherited from western societies and contextualize it within the current historical, (geo)political and cultural juncture in South Africa. In the debate about global media ethics, this revision of South African normative media frameworks may then serve as an example of how western media ethics should be adapted to local contexts.
全球化价值观与后殖民反应
全球化对全世界的媒体技术产生了深远的影响。伴随着媒体形式的全球传播,自由主义关于媒体在民主中的作用的观点也被输出到西方以外的国家。在学术辩论中,越来越多的人试图在寻求普遍伦理的基础上使媒体伦理全球化。然而,后殖民时期非洲国家反对西方自由民主主义媒体在社会中的作用的反应表明,占主导地位的自由主义框架并非普遍适用。在媒体伦理全球化的背景下,鉴于非洲对自由民主框架的反应,本文提供了后殖民背景下不同规范框架之间紧张关系的说明。它以南非媒体环境为例,说明不同的规范性媒体框架可能会发生冲突。概述了在南非民主的第一个十年中规范媒体道德框架的发展,作为媒体在压迫性国家监管时代之后经历的自我监管转变的一部分。在种族隔离后的第一个十年里,媒体与政府之间的关系出现了冲突,在一个以持续的社会两极分化和物质不平等为标志的新民主社会中,媒体的角色和责任也引发了激烈的辩论。本文认为,目前媒体运作的规范框架需要修订。本文建议,这样一个修正项目可以借鉴后殖民理论,以便重新协商从西方社会继承下来的正统媒体伦理框架,并将其置于南非当前的历史、(地缘)政治和文化关头。在关于全球媒体伦理的辩论中,南非规范媒体框架的修订可以作为西方媒体伦理应如何适应当地环境的一个例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信