The Strategy of Cooperation and Competition Based on Comparative Analyses of Pharmaceutical Industries of Korea and India

Woong Lee, Young Chul Song
{"title":"The Strategy of Cooperation and Competition Based on Comparative Analyses of Pharmaceutical Industries of Korea and India","authors":"Woong Lee, Young Chul Song","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2346651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Korean pharmaceutical industry has recently experienced difficulties because of the rebate issue and the Korean government's continued policy to lower drug prices. In addition, the adoption of the drug approval-patent linkage system, following the implementation of the Korea-US and Korea-EU FTAs, could lead to the deterioration of the profitability in Korean pharmaceutical companies.Of the many risks that Korea’s pharmaceutical industry is facing, this study began out of the concerns over the possibility of the entrance into the Korean market by the Indian pharmaceutical firms. With the Korea-India CEPA, which became effective as of 2010, the possibility of the influx of cheap Indian pharmaceutical products into Korea is a potential risk factor to Korea’s pharmaceutical industry with a high level of dependence on the domestic market and generic drugs. India’s pharmaceutical industry is a 16 billion-dollar industry (with 1.5% of the world's market share) and as of 2011, it is the world's 12th largest in terms of sales. In particular, it has been showing a remarkable double-digit growth rate since the start of the new millennium. Such growth rate far surpasses India’s overall economic growth rate and it has been demonstrating sustainable growth despite the recent economic downturn. When compared to Korea’s pharmaceutical industry (ranked 13th in 2011, with 1.4% of the world's market share), the Indian market was smaller than Korea in terms of size. However, as of 2009, India’s pharmaceutical industry has surpassed that of Korea, and the gap continues to grow. Notably, in terms of production quantity of generic drugs, India has about a 20% share of the world’s market. India has the most number of FDA-approved production facilities outside of the U.S., and its pharmaceutical industry has a substantially superior competitive edge as compared to its other industries. Four of the country’s pharmaceutical companies are ranked among the top 100 in the world. When this is considered in light of the fact that none of Korea’s pharmaceutical companies are among the world's top 100, one can gauge the level of competitiveness of India's pharmaceutical industry.","PeriodicalId":129698,"journal":{"name":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supply Chain Management eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2346651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Korean pharmaceutical industry has recently experienced difficulties because of the rebate issue and the Korean government's continued policy to lower drug prices. In addition, the adoption of the drug approval-patent linkage system, following the implementation of the Korea-US and Korea-EU FTAs, could lead to the deterioration of the profitability in Korean pharmaceutical companies.Of the many risks that Korea’s pharmaceutical industry is facing, this study began out of the concerns over the possibility of the entrance into the Korean market by the Indian pharmaceutical firms. With the Korea-India CEPA, which became effective as of 2010, the possibility of the influx of cheap Indian pharmaceutical products into Korea is a potential risk factor to Korea’s pharmaceutical industry with a high level of dependence on the domestic market and generic drugs. India’s pharmaceutical industry is a 16 billion-dollar industry (with 1.5% of the world's market share) and as of 2011, it is the world's 12th largest in terms of sales. In particular, it has been showing a remarkable double-digit growth rate since the start of the new millennium. Such growth rate far surpasses India’s overall economic growth rate and it has been demonstrating sustainable growth despite the recent economic downturn. When compared to Korea’s pharmaceutical industry (ranked 13th in 2011, with 1.4% of the world's market share), the Indian market was smaller than Korea in terms of size. However, as of 2009, India’s pharmaceutical industry has surpassed that of Korea, and the gap continues to grow. Notably, in terms of production quantity of generic drugs, India has about a 20% share of the world’s market. India has the most number of FDA-approved production facilities outside of the U.S., and its pharmaceutical industry has a substantially superior competitive edge as compared to its other industries. Four of the country’s pharmaceutical companies are ranked among the top 100 in the world. When this is considered in light of the fact that none of Korea’s pharmaceutical companies are among the world's top 100, one can gauge the level of competitiveness of India's pharmaceutical industry.
基于韩国和印度医药产业比较分析的合作与竞争战略
由于回扣问题和韩国政府持续降低药价的政策,韩国制药行业最近遇到了困难。另外,随着韩美、韩欧自由贸易协定(fta)的实施,引进药品许可和专利联动制度,有可能导致国内制药企业的收益性恶化。在韩国制药行业面临的诸多风险中,对印度制药企业进入韩国市场的可能性的担忧是此次研究的出发点。从2010年开始生效的韩印CEPA,对依赖国内市场和仿制药的韩国制药业来说,廉价的印度药品流入韩国的可能性是潜在的危险因素。印度的制药业是一个160亿美元的产业(占世界市场份额的1.5%),截至2011年,印度的销售额位居世界第12位。特别是进入新世纪以来,一直保持着两位数的增长率。这样的增长率远远超过了印度的整体经济增长率,尽管最近经济低迷,但印度一直表现出可持续的增长。与韩国制药产业(2011年排名第13位,占世界市场份额的1.4%)相比,印度的市场规模比韩国小。但是,以2009年为基准,印度的制药产业已经超过了韩国,而且差距还在继续扩大。值得注意的是,就仿制药的生产数量而言,印度约占世界市场的20%。印度是美国以外获得fda批准的生产设施最多的国家,与其他行业相比,印度的制药业具有显著的竞争优势。该国有四家制药公司跻身世界百强。考虑到韩国制药企业没有一家进入世界百强的事实,印度制药产业的竞争力也就可想而知了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信