A comparative survey of SSVEP recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trials

Tian-jian Luo
{"title":"A comparative survey of SSVEP recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trials","authors":"Tian-jian Luo","doi":"10.1108/ijicc-01-2022-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeSteady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) has been widely used in the application of electroencephalogram (EEG) based non-invasive brain computer interface (BCI) due to its characteristics of high accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR). To recognize the SSVEP components in collected EEG trials, a lot of recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trials have been proposed and applied in recent years. In this paper, a comparative survey of SSVEP recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trails has been done.Design/methodology/approachTo survey and compare the recently proposed recognition algorithms for SSVEP, this paper regarded the conventional canonical correlated analysis (CCA) as the baseline, and selected individual template CCA (ITCCA), multi-set CCA (MsetCCA), task related component analysis (TRCA), latent common source extraction (LCSE) and a sum of squared correlation (SSCOR) for comparison.FindingsFor the horizontal comparative of the six surveyed recognition algorithms, this paper adopted the “Tsinghua JFPM-SSVEP” data set and compared the average recognition performance on such data set. The comparative contents including: recognition accuracy, ITR, correlated coefficient and R-square values under different time duration of the SSVEP stimulus presentation. Based on the optimal time duration of stimulus presentation, the author has also compared the efficiency of the six compared algorithms. To measure the influence of different parameters, the number of training trials, the number of electrodes and the usage of filter bank preprocessing were compared in the ablation study.Originality/valueBased on the comparative results, this paper analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the six compared SSVEP recognition algorithms by considering application scenes, real-time and computational complexity. Finally, the author gives the algorithms selection range for the recognition of real-world online SSVEP-BCI.","PeriodicalId":352072,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern.","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Intell. Comput. Cybern.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijicc-01-2022-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PurposeSteady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) has been widely used in the application of electroencephalogram (EEG) based non-invasive brain computer interface (BCI) due to its characteristics of high accuracy and information transfer rate (ITR). To recognize the SSVEP components in collected EEG trials, a lot of recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trials have been proposed and applied in recent years. In this paper, a comparative survey of SSVEP recognition algorithms based on template matching of training trails has been done.Design/methodology/approachTo survey and compare the recently proposed recognition algorithms for SSVEP, this paper regarded the conventional canonical correlated analysis (CCA) as the baseline, and selected individual template CCA (ITCCA), multi-set CCA (MsetCCA), task related component analysis (TRCA), latent common source extraction (LCSE) and a sum of squared correlation (SSCOR) for comparison.FindingsFor the horizontal comparative of the six surveyed recognition algorithms, this paper adopted the “Tsinghua JFPM-SSVEP” data set and compared the average recognition performance on such data set. The comparative contents including: recognition accuracy, ITR, correlated coefficient and R-square values under different time duration of the SSVEP stimulus presentation. Based on the optimal time duration of stimulus presentation, the author has also compared the efficiency of the six compared algorithms. To measure the influence of different parameters, the number of training trials, the number of electrodes and the usage of filter bank preprocessing were compared in the ablation study.Originality/valueBased on the comparative results, this paper analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of the six compared SSVEP recognition algorithms by considering application scenes, real-time and computational complexity. Finally, the author gives the algorithms selection range for the recognition of real-world online SSVEP-BCI.
基于训练试验模板匹配的SSVEP识别算法比较研究
目的稳态视觉诱发电位(SSVEP)由于具有较高的准确性和信息传输率(ITR)等特点,在基于脑电图(EEG)的无创脑机接口(BCI)应用中得到了广泛的应用。为了识别采集到的脑电试验中的SSVEP分量,近年来提出了许多基于训练试验模板匹配的识别算法并得到了应用。本文对基于训练轨迹模板匹配的SSVEP识别算法进行了比较研究。设计/方法/方法为了对近年来提出的SSVEP识别算法进行调查和比较,本文以传统的典型相关分析(CCA)为基准,选择单个模板相关分析(ITCCA)、多集相关分析(MsetCCA)、任务相关成分分析(TRCA)、潜在共同源提取(LCSE)和相关平方和(SSCOR)进行比较。为了横向比较所调查的六种识别算法,本文采用“清华JFPM-SSVEP”数据集,比较该数据集上的平均识别性能。比较内容包括:SSVEP刺激呈现不同时间持续下的识别准确率、ITR、相关系数和r平方值。基于刺激呈现的最优时间长度,作者还比较了六种比较算法的效率。为了衡量不同参数的影响,在烧蚀研究中比较了训练试验次数、电极数量和滤波组预处理的使用情况。独创性/价值在对比结果的基础上,从应用场景、实时性和计算复杂度等方面分析了六种SSVEP对比识别算法的优缺点。最后给出了现实世界在线SSVEP-BCI识别的算法选择范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信