Reliability test induced failures vs field performance: Contact fretting perspective

K. Meyyappan, Qifeng Wu, M. Vujosevic, C. Hill, Ryan Parrott
{"title":"Reliability test induced failures vs field performance: Contact fretting perspective","authors":"K. Meyyappan, Qifeng Wu, M. Vujosevic, C. Hill, Ryan Parrott","doi":"10.1109/HOLM.2017.8088071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Connectors, based on the applications, can be exposed to a wide variety of reliability risks. To ensure products meet reliability requirements, qualifications tests are performed in laboratory settings. These tests are accelerated to meet the time-to-market requirements. Incorrect accelerated reliability models can lead to inaccurate field reliability risk assessment. Additionally, a chosen test can generate different failure modes, which are unlikely to be accelerated the same amount in the laboratory settings. In this paper, the authors evaluate some of the existing test methods and requirements vs. actual field vibration data for vibration induced contact fretting. The reliability model for contact fretting is based on a multiscale finite element approach. This model is used to evaluate contact micromotion from the standards based test methods that cover operational vibration in automotive electronics and non- operational packaged shipping vibration. The same model is then used to study contact micromotion in actual use condition. Intent of this exercise is to validate the appropriateness of standards based test in reflecting field reliability risks from a contact fretting perspective.","PeriodicalId":354484,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HOLM.2017.8088071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Connectors, based on the applications, can be exposed to a wide variety of reliability risks. To ensure products meet reliability requirements, qualifications tests are performed in laboratory settings. These tests are accelerated to meet the time-to-market requirements. Incorrect accelerated reliability models can lead to inaccurate field reliability risk assessment. Additionally, a chosen test can generate different failure modes, which are unlikely to be accelerated the same amount in the laboratory settings. In this paper, the authors evaluate some of the existing test methods and requirements vs. actual field vibration data for vibration induced contact fretting. The reliability model for contact fretting is based on a multiscale finite element approach. This model is used to evaluate contact micromotion from the standards based test methods that cover operational vibration in automotive electronics and non- operational packaged shipping vibration. The same model is then used to study contact micromotion in actual use condition. Intent of this exercise is to validate the appropriateness of standards based test in reflecting field reliability risks from a contact fretting perspective.
可靠性测试诱发的故障与现场性能:接触微动的观点
根据应用的不同,连接器可能面临各种各样的可靠性风险。为确保产品符合可靠性要求,在实验室环境中进行资格测试。这些测试被加快以满足上市时间的要求。不正确的加速可靠性模型会导致不准确的现场可靠性风险评估。此外,选择的测试可能产生不同的失效模式,在实验室设置中不太可能加速相同的数量。在本文中,作者对振动诱发接触微动的一些现有测试方法和要求与实际现场振动数据进行了评估。接触微动的可靠性模型是基于多尺度有限元方法建立的。该模型用于评估基于标准的接触微动测试方法,包括汽车电子产品的操作振动和非操作包装运输振动。然后用相同的模型研究了实际使用条件下的接触微运动。本练习的目的是从接触微扰的角度验证基于标准的测试在反映现场可靠性风险方面的适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信