The unsustainability of Extractive Reserves in the Amazon: socioeconomic demands versus environmental conservation

J. S. Freitas, M. F. Filho, A. Homma, A. Mathis
{"title":"The unsustainability of Extractive Reserves in the Amazon: socioeconomic demands versus environmental conservation","authors":"J. S. Freitas, M. F. Filho, A. Homma, A. Mathis","doi":"10.18316/DESENV.V9I1.6153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Extractive Reserves (RESEXs) have temporarily lost their Conservation Units of sustainable use identity, as the results are unsustainable. Little past work has evaluated why this is so, and the studies that do exist fail to evaluate sustainable development based on the interrelationships between the state, production systems, and environmental impacts. This study attempts to fill that gap by evaluating the state policies, production systems, and environmental impacts preventing sustainable conservation and development. We conducted our research through the study of association with interference, where some variables depend on others. In addition, we conducted semi-open and free interviews. We conclude that RESEXs are unsustainable because these areas were created for ecosystem conservation, not for the betterment of thousands of families. This unsustainable development occurs to the detriment of state abandonment, repression, and exclusion.","PeriodicalId":235704,"journal":{"name":"Desenvolve: Revista de Gestão do Unilasalle","volume":"351 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Desenvolve: Revista de Gestão do Unilasalle","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18316/DESENV.V9I1.6153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The Extractive Reserves (RESEXs) have temporarily lost their Conservation Units of sustainable use identity, as the results are unsustainable. Little past work has evaluated why this is so, and the studies that do exist fail to evaluate sustainable development based on the interrelationships between the state, production systems, and environmental impacts. This study attempts to fill that gap by evaluating the state policies, production systems, and environmental impacts preventing sustainable conservation and development. We conducted our research through the study of association with interference, where some variables depend on others. In addition, we conducted semi-open and free interviews. We conclude that RESEXs are unsustainable because these areas were created for ecosystem conservation, not for the betterment of thousands of families. This unsustainable development occurs to the detriment of state abandonment, repression, and exclusion.
亚马逊地区采掘储备的不可持续性:社会经济需求与环境保护
采掘保护区(RESEXs)暂时失去了其可持续利用保护单位的身份,因为其结果是不可持续的。过去很少有研究评估为什么会这样,而且现有的研究也未能基于国家、生产系统和环境影响之间的相互关系来评估可持续发展。本研究试图通过评估阻碍可持续保护和发展的国家政策、生产系统和环境影响来填补这一空白。我们通过研究与干扰的关联来进行我们的研究,其中一些变量依赖于其他变量。此外,我们还进行了半公开和自由的采访。我们的结论是,RESEXs是不可持续的,因为这些地区是为了保护生态系统而创建的,而不是为了改善成千上万的家庭。这种不可持续的发展导致了国家的抛弃、镇压和排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信