Predicting marital satisfaction from the attachment styles and gender of a culturally and religiously homogenous population

I. F. Ottu, U. Akpan
{"title":"Predicting marital satisfaction from the attachment styles and gender of a culturally and religiously homogenous population","authors":"I. F. Ottu, U. Akpan","doi":"10.4314/GAB.V9I1.67466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated the influence of attachment styles and gender on marital satisfaction. One hundred and fifty participants (73 males and 77 females) were randomly selected from members of a Christian organization, Ewet Offot and indigenous residents of Nwaniba Road, Uyo. Two instruments used were the Love (2001) Attachment Style Survey and Hudson (1982) Index of Marital Satisfaction adapted by Anene (1994) for Nigerian use. A 2x2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for unequal sample sizes was used for data analysis.Two hypotheses were tested. The first hypothesis predicted a statistically significant difference in marital satisfaction between participants with secure and insecure attachment styles while the second hypothesis made a similar prediction in respect of gender. The first finding showed a significant difference between  participants with secure and insecure attachment styles on marital satisfaction [F(1,146) = 360.21, P that there was no significant difference between males and females on marital satisfaction [F(1,146) = 2.58, P>.05]. The interaction effect of attachment styles and gender was however found to be significant [F(1,146) = 5.00, P concerns about the role of gender in the study. Statistical evidence suggests that such interactions signify that any related variable, and in this case gender, has reliable effects on the measured variable. These manifest and latent findings were discussed in line with existing evidence and suggestions made for therapy, intervention and policy.","PeriodicalId":308310,"journal":{"name":"Gender and behaviour","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/GAB.V9I1.67466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

The study investigated the influence of attachment styles and gender on marital satisfaction. One hundred and fifty participants (73 males and 77 females) were randomly selected from members of a Christian organization, Ewet Offot and indigenous residents of Nwaniba Road, Uyo. Two instruments used were the Love (2001) Attachment Style Survey and Hudson (1982) Index of Marital Satisfaction adapted by Anene (1994) for Nigerian use. A 2x2 Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for unequal sample sizes was used for data analysis.Two hypotheses were tested. The first hypothesis predicted a statistically significant difference in marital satisfaction between participants with secure and insecure attachment styles while the second hypothesis made a similar prediction in respect of gender. The first finding showed a significant difference between  participants with secure and insecure attachment styles on marital satisfaction [F(1,146) = 360.21, P that there was no significant difference between males and females on marital satisfaction [F(1,146) = 2.58, P>.05]. The interaction effect of attachment styles and gender was however found to be significant [F(1,146) = 5.00, P concerns about the role of gender in the study. Statistical evidence suggests that such interactions signify that any related variable, and in this case gender, has reliable effects on the measured variable. These manifest and latent findings were discussed in line with existing evidence and suggestions made for therapy, intervention and policy.
从文化和宗教同质人群的依恋风格和性别预测婚姻满意度
本研究探讨了依恋类型和性别对婚姻满意度的影响。150名参与者(73名男性和77名女性)从基督教组织Ewet Offot的成员和尤约州Nwaniba路的土著居民中随机抽取。使用的两种工具是爱情(2001)依恋风格调查和哈德森(1982)婚姻满意度指数,由Anene(1994)改编,供尼日利亚使用。采用2x2方差分析(ANOVA)对不等样本量进行数据分析。测试了两个假设。第一个假设预测了安全感和不安全感依恋类型的参与者在婚姻满意度上的统计显著差异,而第二个假设在性别方面做出了类似的预测。第一项研究结果显示,安全型依恋类型与非安全型依恋类型的被试在婚姻满意度上存在显著差异[F(1146) = 360.21,而男性与女性在婚姻满意度上无显著差异[F(1146) = 2.58, P < 0.05]。然而,依恋类型和性别的交互作用被发现是显著的[F(1146) = 5.00, P关注性别在研究中的作用。统计证据表明,这种相互作用表明,任何相关变量,在本例中是性别,对测量变量有可靠的影响。这些明显的和潜在的发现是根据现有的证据和建议的治疗,干预和政策进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信