Hybrid Cultures: the Visibility of the European Invasion of Caribbean Honduras in the Sixteenth Century

Russell N. Sheptak, R. Joyce
{"title":"Hybrid Cultures: the Visibility of the European Invasion of Caribbean Honduras in the Sixteenth Century","authors":"Russell N. Sheptak, R. Joyce","doi":"10.1163/9789004273689_011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Americas have been an especially important setting for the development of new understandings of the historical processes that followed colonization by Europeans, who acted as agents to introduce large populations of African origin, resulting in a colonial situation of great complexity. Originally conceived of as ‘culture contact,’ these discussions rapidly gained in sophistication (Lightfoot 1995; Lightfoot et al. 1998). Critiques of the idea of contact, in which two somewhat homogeneous entities collided, with the stronger exercising some sort of hegemony over the weaker, were accompanied by the development of detailed investigations of specific historical engagements (Silliman 2005, 2010). These blurred the lines between what could be considered original or novel, ‘authentic’ or hybrid. Models for the emergence of new populations with newly formed identities have been most completely developed under the framework of ethnogenesis (Palka 2005; Voss 2008; Weik 2004). Weik (2004, 36) defined ethnogenesis as, ‘the formation of new or different sociocultural groups from the interactions, intermixtures, and antagonisms among people who took part in global processes of colonialism and slavery’. Our research explores the colonial situation of a region centered on the city of San Pedro Sula, part of the Honduran province of the Captaincy General of Guatemala. Founded in ad 1536 as a Spanish villa (incorporated town), San Pedro flourished as the center for transmission of products of gold mines toward ports, until gold smelting was moved inland in the early 1580s to the colonial capital city, Comayagua. From that point on, the Spanish citizenry of San Pedro Sula steadily declined. We argue that in fact, the transformation of Honduran indigenous life preceded the formal incorporation of the province of the río Ulúa into the administrative district of San Pedro. For more than a decade before the founding of the city, indigenous towns in northern Honduras had experienced impacts of disease, raiding to capture labor for mines elsewhere in Central America,","PeriodicalId":293206,"journal":{"name":"Material Encounters and Indigenous Transformations in the Early Colonial Americas","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Material Encounters and Indigenous Transformations in the Early Colonial Americas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004273689_011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The Americas have been an especially important setting for the development of new understandings of the historical processes that followed colonization by Europeans, who acted as agents to introduce large populations of African origin, resulting in a colonial situation of great complexity. Originally conceived of as ‘culture contact,’ these discussions rapidly gained in sophistication (Lightfoot 1995; Lightfoot et al. 1998). Critiques of the idea of contact, in which two somewhat homogeneous entities collided, with the stronger exercising some sort of hegemony over the weaker, were accompanied by the development of detailed investigations of specific historical engagements (Silliman 2005, 2010). These blurred the lines between what could be considered original or novel, ‘authentic’ or hybrid. Models for the emergence of new populations with newly formed identities have been most completely developed under the framework of ethnogenesis (Palka 2005; Voss 2008; Weik 2004). Weik (2004, 36) defined ethnogenesis as, ‘the formation of new or different sociocultural groups from the interactions, intermixtures, and antagonisms among people who took part in global processes of colonialism and slavery’. Our research explores the colonial situation of a region centered on the city of San Pedro Sula, part of the Honduran province of the Captaincy General of Guatemala. Founded in ad 1536 as a Spanish villa (incorporated town), San Pedro flourished as the center for transmission of products of gold mines toward ports, until gold smelting was moved inland in the early 1580s to the colonial capital city, Comayagua. From that point on, the Spanish citizenry of San Pedro Sula steadily declined. We argue that in fact, the transformation of Honduran indigenous life preceded the formal incorporation of the province of the río Ulúa into the administrative district of San Pedro. For more than a decade before the founding of the city, indigenous towns in northern Honduras had experienced impacts of disease, raiding to capture labor for mines elsewhere in Central America,
混合文化:16世纪欧洲入侵加勒比海洪都拉斯的可见性
美洲一直是发展对欧洲人殖民之后的历史进程的新理解的一个特别重要的背景,欧洲人作为代理人引入了大量非洲裔人口,导致了非常复杂的殖民局势。这些讨论最初被认为是“文化接触”,但很快变得复杂起来(Lightfoot 1995;Lightfoot et al. 1998)。对接触观念的批评伴随着对具体历史交往的详细调查的发展(Silliman 2005, 2010),在接触观念中,两个某种程度上同质的实体相互碰撞,强者对弱者行使某种霸权。这些模糊了原创或新颖,“真实”或混合之间的界限。具有新形成身份的新人口出现的模型在人种发生的框架下得到了最完整的发展(Palka 2005;沃斯2008;Weik 2004)。Weik(2004,36)将民族发生定义为“参与全球殖民主义和奴隶制进程的人们之间的相互作用、混合和对抗中形成新的或不同的社会文化群体”。我们的研究探讨了以圣佩德罗苏拉市为中心的一个地区的殖民情况,这是危地马拉总督洪都拉斯省的一部分。圣佩德罗始建于公元1536年,最初是一个西班牙别墅(合并城镇),作为向港口输送金矿产品的中心而蓬勃发展,直到1580年代早期黄金冶炼被转移到内陆的殖民地首都科马亚瓜。从那时起,圣佩德罗苏拉的西班牙公民数量稳步下降。我们认为,事实上,洪都拉斯土著生活的转变早于río Ulúa省正式并入圣佩德罗行政区。在这座城市建立之前的十多年里,洪都拉斯北部的土著城镇经历了疾病的影响,为中美洲其他地方的矿山掠夺劳动力,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信