Gender Disparities in Academic Rank and Writing amongst Medical Faculty Members

A. Fahim
{"title":"Gender Disparities in Academic Rank and Writing amongst Medical Faculty Members","authors":"A. Fahim","doi":"10.53708/hpej.v3i2.98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Pakistan is a proud country with its rich cultural values. A perfect woman is considered the one who is a good subordinate and most skillful in the kitchen, making round chapatis is the highlight of those skills. Although as a nation, stereotypical norms have shifted and females are encouraged to get medical education and become doctors, their academic contribution and representation in higher academic rank seems scarce. \nMethodology: In this study, we investigate gender differences in academic ranks and research in renowned Medical Institutions of Pakistan. Websites of three institutions were used to identify male and female faculty members, their respective publications were counted using “Pakmedinet.com” and “Scholar.google.com”. \nResults: A one-way ANOVA showed significant difference in the male female ratio at higher academic ranks. This ratio drastically increases at Full Professor level where males are three times more than female Professors. ANOVA results also show that publications by male faculty members is significantly higher than females. Even on the same rank, women have not published their work in the same capacity as men. \nConclusion: The results are in alignment with several previous studies that indicate gender disparities between males and females especially as they climb up the academic ladder. Publications are a measure of academic productivity. This study suggests that although female representation as faculty members have increased over the years, their lack of frequent publications might be a factor that hinders women in advancing in academic ranks. Continued studies are required to explore more reasons for this gender inequality and highlight methods to address the imbalance.  ","PeriodicalId":338468,"journal":{"name":"Health Professions Educator Journal","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Professions Educator Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53708/hpej.v3i2.98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pakistan is a proud country with its rich cultural values. A perfect woman is considered the one who is a good subordinate and most skillful in the kitchen, making round chapatis is the highlight of those skills. Although as a nation, stereotypical norms have shifted and females are encouraged to get medical education and become doctors, their academic contribution and representation in higher academic rank seems scarce. Methodology: In this study, we investigate gender differences in academic ranks and research in renowned Medical Institutions of Pakistan. Websites of three institutions were used to identify male and female faculty members, their respective publications were counted using “Pakmedinet.com” and “Scholar.google.com”. Results: A one-way ANOVA showed significant difference in the male female ratio at higher academic ranks. This ratio drastically increases at Full Professor level where males are three times more than female Professors. ANOVA results also show that publications by male faculty members is significantly higher than females. Even on the same rank, women have not published their work in the same capacity as men. Conclusion: The results are in alignment with several previous studies that indicate gender disparities between males and females especially as they climb up the academic ladder. Publications are a measure of academic productivity. This study suggests that although female representation as faculty members have increased over the years, their lack of frequent publications might be a factor that hinders women in advancing in academic ranks. Continued studies are required to explore more reasons for this gender inequality and highlight methods to address the imbalance.  
医学教员学术等级和写作的性别差异
背景:巴基斯坦是一个自豪的国家,有着丰富的文化价值。一个完美的女人被认为是一个好的下属和最熟练的厨房,做圆形的薄饼是这些技能的亮点。尽管作为一个国家,刻板的规范已经改变,女性被鼓励接受医学教育并成为医生,但她们的学术贡献和在更高学术级别的代表性似乎很少。方法:在本研究中,我们调查了巴基斯坦著名医疗机构在学术级别和研究方面的性别差异。三所院校的网站用来确定男女教员的身份,他们各自发表的论文则通过“Pakmedinet.com”和“Scholar.google.com”进行统计。结果:单因素方差分析显示,高学衔的男女比例有显著差异。这一比率在男性是女性的3倍的正教授级别上急剧上升。方差分析结果也显示,男性教师发表的论文显著高于女性。即使在相同的级别上,女性也没有以与男性相同的身份发表自己的作品。结论:该结果与之前的几项研究一致,表明男性和女性之间存在性别差异,尤其是在他们爬上学术阶梯的过程中。出版物是衡量学术生产力的标准。这项研究表明,尽管女性作为教职员工的比例近年来有所增加,但她们缺乏经常发表的文章可能是阻碍女性在学术排名中取得进步的一个因素。需要继续的研究来探索这种性别不平等的更多原因,并提出解决这种不平衡的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信