Dispute of the Contracts: A Case from Sikta Irrigation Project, Banke, Nepal

Anjay Kumar Mishra, Prakash Yada, P. Aithal
{"title":"Dispute of the Contracts: A Case from Sikta Irrigation Project, Banke, Nepal","authors":"Anjay Kumar Mishra, Prakash Yada, P. Aithal","doi":"10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Government of Nepal (GoN) is implementing many small, medium and large type of Irrigation Projects. Sikta Irrigation Project (SIP) is the National Pride Project implemented by the GoN. The command area of the project has 42766.00 ha and the beneficiary of the project have 46715 households consisting of 4,49,588 population of Banke district. The overall objective of the study is to assess the consequences of delay and dispute of the selected contracts of Sikta Irrigation Project, Banke, Nepal. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach: Using secondary data of the contract the mean planned duration is compared with mean actual duration to analyze delay analysis and Disputes of the contract have been interpreted based on standards of contract using content analysis. \nFindings/Result: The mean planned duration of the contracts under the study is 17.42 months and mean actual time 32.28 months with a standard deviation of 7.72 months and meantime variance is 13.46 months behind the schedule and meantime overrun is 14.85 months. Dispute resolution of only Papu costal JV has been analyzed. The contracts need to be rectified in terms of time by proper scheduling and resource leveling based local calendar. Hope the new amendments (PPMO 10th) of time extension will be helpful for the timely completion of contracts.\nOriginality/Value: Action research to enhance the performance of Projects by avoiding Disputes. \nPaper Type: Analytical Policy Research.","PeriodicalId":108610,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Infrastructure (Topic)","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Infrastructure (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47992/ijcsbe.2581.6942.0108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: Government of Nepal (GoN) is implementing many small, medium and large type of Irrigation Projects. Sikta Irrigation Project (SIP) is the National Pride Project implemented by the GoN. The command area of the project has 42766.00 ha and the beneficiary of the project have 46715 households consisting of 4,49,588 population of Banke district. The overall objective of the study is to assess the consequences of delay and dispute of the selected contracts of Sikta Irrigation Project, Banke, Nepal. Design/Methodology/Approach: Using secondary data of the contract the mean planned duration is compared with mean actual duration to analyze delay analysis and Disputes of the contract have been interpreted based on standards of contract using content analysis. Findings/Result: The mean planned duration of the contracts under the study is 17.42 months and mean actual time 32.28 months with a standard deviation of 7.72 months and meantime variance is 13.46 months behind the schedule and meantime overrun is 14.85 months. Dispute resolution of only Papu costal JV has been analyzed. The contracts need to be rectified in terms of time by proper scheduling and resource leveling based local calendar. Hope the new amendments (PPMO 10th) of time extension will be helpful for the timely completion of contracts. Originality/Value: Action research to enhance the performance of Projects by avoiding Disputes. Paper Type: Analytical Policy Research.
合同纠纷:以尼泊尔银行锡克塔灌溉工程为例
目的:尼泊尔政府正在实施许多小型、中型和大型灌溉项目。锡克塔灌溉项目(SIP)是印度邦实施的国家骄傲项目。项目指挥面积42766.00公顷,受益户数46715户,惠及班克区人口449,588人。本研究的总体目标是评估尼泊尔班克Sikta灌溉项目选定合同的延误和争议的后果。设计/方法/方法:使用合同的二手数据,将平均计划工期与平均实际工期进行比较,分析延迟分析,并根据合同标准使用内容分析对合同争议进行解释。结果:本研究项目合同的平均计划工期为17.42个月,平均实际工期为32.28个月,标准差为7.72个月,同时方差落后于计划13.46个月,同时超支14.85个月。分析了仅巴库沿海合资企业的争议解决。合同需要根据当地日历,通过适当的调度和资源平衡来调整时间。希望新的时间延长修正案(PPMO第10号)对合同的及时完成有所帮助。独创性/价值:通过避免争议来提高项目绩效的行动研究。论文类型:分析性政策研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信