Selection of structural system for wooden public building: Multiple criteria approach

L. Tupėnaitė, T. Gečys, Loreta Kanapeckiene, S. Sajjadian, Jurga Naimaviciene
{"title":"Selection of structural system for wooden public building: Multiple criteria approach","authors":"L. Tupėnaitė, T. Gečys, Loreta Kanapeckiene, S. Sajjadian, Jurga Naimaviciene","doi":"10.3846/mbmst.2019.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a growing interest in the construction industry for using materials with lower environmental\nimpacts, in this context, stakeholders increasingly seeing wood as the natural and sustainable option for public buildings. Studies worldwide have already investigated modern structural systems for wooden construction. However, the\nselection of alternative structural systems is rarely discussed, alternatives are seldom compared. To close a gap this\npaper proposes a framework for selection of the structural system for a wooden public building based on a Simple\nAdditive Weighting (SAW) multiple criteria assessment method. The proposed methodology is applied for the case of\na public wooden building – shopping centre in Lithuania. Three structural systems (1) double tapered glued laminated\nbeams and columns, (2) laminated veneer lumber (LVL) trusses and columns and (3) single tapered glued laminated\nbeam and I type steel column are compared. The research allowed distinguishing the most efficient structural system\naccording to eight conflicting quantitative and qualitative criteria, which, in this case, contains double tapered glued\nlaminated beams and columns. Proposed assessment framework is relatively simple to apply, therefore can be successfully used in practice.","PeriodicalId":169478,"journal":{"name":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There has been a growing interest in the construction industry for using materials with lower environmental impacts, in this context, stakeholders increasingly seeing wood as the natural and sustainable option for public buildings. Studies worldwide have already investigated modern structural systems for wooden construction. However, the selection of alternative structural systems is rarely discussed, alternatives are seldom compared. To close a gap this paper proposes a framework for selection of the structural system for a wooden public building based on a Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) multiple criteria assessment method. The proposed methodology is applied for the case of a public wooden building – shopping centre in Lithuania. Three structural systems (1) double tapered glued laminated beams and columns, (2) laminated veneer lumber (LVL) trusses and columns and (3) single tapered glued laminated beam and I type steel column are compared. The research allowed distinguishing the most efficient structural system according to eight conflicting quantitative and qualitative criteria, which, in this case, contains double tapered glued laminated beams and columns. Proposed assessment framework is relatively simple to apply, therefore can be successfully used in practice.
木质公共建筑结构体系的选择:多准则方法
建筑行业对使用对环境影响较小的材料越来越感兴趣,在这种情况下,利益相关者越来越多地将木材视为公共建筑的自然和可持续选择。世界范围内的研究已经对木结构的现代结构体系进行了研究。然而,替代结构体系的选择很少被讨论,很少被比较。为了缩小这一差距,本文提出了一种基于简单加性加权(SAW)多准则评价方法的木质公共建筑结构体系选择框架。所提出的方法应用于立陶宛的一个公共木制建筑-购物中心的案例。比较了三种结构体系(1)双锥形胶合层合梁柱,(2)层合单板(LVL)桁架和柱,(3)单锥形胶合层合梁和I型钢柱。研究允许根据八个相互冲突的定量和定性标准区分最有效的结构系统,在这种情况下,包含双锥形胶合层压梁和柱。所提出的评估框架应用相对简单,因此可以在实践中成功使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信