L. Tupėnaitė, T. Gečys, Loreta Kanapeckiene, S. Sajjadian, Jurga Naimaviciene
{"title":"Selection of structural system for wooden public building: Multiple criteria approach","authors":"L. Tupėnaitė, T. Gečys, Loreta Kanapeckiene, S. Sajjadian, Jurga Naimaviciene","doi":"10.3846/mbmst.2019.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a growing interest in the construction industry for using materials with lower environmental\nimpacts, in this context, stakeholders increasingly seeing wood as the natural and sustainable option for public buildings. Studies worldwide have already investigated modern structural systems for wooden construction. However, the\nselection of alternative structural systems is rarely discussed, alternatives are seldom compared. To close a gap this\npaper proposes a framework for selection of the structural system for a wooden public building based on a Simple\nAdditive Weighting (SAW) multiple criteria assessment method. The proposed methodology is applied for the case of\na public wooden building – shopping centre in Lithuania. Three structural systems (1) double tapered glued laminated\nbeams and columns, (2) laminated veneer lumber (LVL) trusses and columns and (3) single tapered glued laminated\nbeam and I type steel column are compared. The research allowed distinguishing the most efficient structural system\naccording to eight conflicting quantitative and qualitative criteria, which, in this case, contains double tapered glued\nlaminated beams and columns. Proposed assessment framework is relatively simple to apply, therefore can be successfully used in practice.","PeriodicalId":169478,"journal":{"name":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The proceedings of the 13th international conference \"Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques\" (MBMST 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/mbmst.2019.074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There has been a growing interest in the construction industry for using materials with lower environmental
impacts, in this context, stakeholders increasingly seeing wood as the natural and sustainable option for public buildings. Studies worldwide have already investigated modern structural systems for wooden construction. However, the
selection of alternative structural systems is rarely discussed, alternatives are seldom compared. To close a gap this
paper proposes a framework for selection of the structural system for a wooden public building based on a Simple
Additive Weighting (SAW) multiple criteria assessment method. The proposed methodology is applied for the case of
a public wooden building – shopping centre in Lithuania. Three structural systems (1) double tapered glued laminated
beams and columns, (2) laminated veneer lumber (LVL) trusses and columns and (3) single tapered glued laminated
beam and I type steel column are compared. The research allowed distinguishing the most efficient structural system
according to eight conflicting quantitative and qualitative criteria, which, in this case, contains double tapered glued
laminated beams and columns. Proposed assessment framework is relatively simple to apply, therefore can be successfully used in practice.