{"title":"ISU KETUANAN MELAYU DI MALAYSIA","authors":"Amri Marzali","doi":"10.22452/jomas.vol32no2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses an important political concept in Malaysia, that is the political supremacy of the Malays. The Malays supremacy was resulted from a social contract between the native Malays, on one part, and the Indian and Chinese immigrants, on the other part, during the negotiation concerning the independent of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu before 1957. It was said in the contract the native Malays slackened the prerequisites for the citizenship of the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu for the Chinese and Indian immigrants, while the Chinese and the Indian immigrants admitted a dominant position of the Malays in political administration. However, after the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu changed into Malaysia in 1963, the Chinese and the Indians begin to be disloyal to the social contract. They wanted equal right among all Malaysian citizens. By using archaeological dan ethnohistorical approaches, I will trace the origins of the concept of native supremacy in the Malay Nusantara sosiocultural context. Secondly, I will discuss the challenges facing the concept after Malay Land occupied by the British colonialist, particularly after the 1960es. The concept of “native sovereignity” is called beschikkingsrecht in Dutch language. It was invented by a Dutch expert of customary law, van Vollenhoven, in 1909 (ter Haar 1962). The concept of “native sovereignity” was originally aimed to remind the neighbour villagers or the foreigners when they passed on, or open a rice field, in a new area. They had to ask permission to the master of the land. Therefore, for the sake of harmonious social life, all ethnic groups in todays Malaysia, especially the new immigrants from different cultural background, it is suggested to learn and comprehend basic concepts in traditional native Malays customary law. Keywords: native Malays, ethnicity, native sovereignity, beschikkingsrecht, Will of the Malay Kings.","PeriodicalId":220581,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pengajian Melayu","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pengajian Melayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22452/jomas.vol32no2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This article discusses an important political concept in Malaysia, that is the political supremacy of the Malays. The Malays supremacy was resulted from a social contract between the native Malays, on one part, and the Indian and Chinese immigrants, on the other part, during the negotiation concerning the independent of Persekutuan Tanah Melayu before 1957. It was said in the contract the native Malays slackened the prerequisites for the citizenship of the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu for the Chinese and Indian immigrants, while the Chinese and the Indian immigrants admitted a dominant position of the Malays in political administration. However, after the Persekutuan Tanah Melayu changed into Malaysia in 1963, the Chinese and the Indians begin to be disloyal to the social contract. They wanted equal right among all Malaysian citizens. By using archaeological dan ethnohistorical approaches, I will trace the origins of the concept of native supremacy in the Malay Nusantara sosiocultural context. Secondly, I will discuss the challenges facing the concept after Malay Land occupied by the British colonialist, particularly after the 1960es. The concept of “native sovereignity” is called beschikkingsrecht in Dutch language. It was invented by a Dutch expert of customary law, van Vollenhoven, in 1909 (ter Haar 1962). The concept of “native sovereignity” was originally aimed to remind the neighbour villagers or the foreigners when they passed on, or open a rice field, in a new area. They had to ask permission to the master of the land. Therefore, for the sake of harmonious social life, all ethnic groups in todays Malaysia, especially the new immigrants from different cultural background, it is suggested to learn and comprehend basic concepts in traditional native Malays customary law. Keywords: native Malays, ethnicity, native sovereignity, beschikkingsrecht, Will of the Malay Kings.
本文讨论了马来西亚一个重要的政治概念,即马来人的政治至上。马来人的优越地位是在1957年之前关于马来独立的谈判中,本地马来人与印度和中国移民之间的社会契约的结果。据说,在契约中,马来人放宽了华人和印度移民获得马来民族公民权的先决条件,而华人和印度移民则承认马来人在政治管理中占主导地位。然而,在1963年马来民族转变为马来西亚后,华人和印度人开始不忠于社会契约。他们要求所有马来西亚公民享有平等的权利。通过使用考古和民族历史的方法,我将在马来努桑塔拉社会文化背景下追溯原住民至上概念的起源。其次,我将讨论马来人土地被英国殖民者占领后,特别是在20世纪60年代之后,这个概念所面临的挑战。“本土主权”的概念在荷兰语中被称为beschikkingstrecht。它是由荷兰习惯法专家van Vollenhoven于1909年发明的(ter Haar 1962)。“本土主权”的概念最初是为了提醒邻近的村民或外国人,当他们在一个新的地区经过或开辟稻田时。他们必须征得土地主人的同意。因此,为了和谐的社会生活,今天马来西亚的各民族,特别是来自不同文化背景的新移民,建议学习和理解传统马来本土习惯法中的基本概念。关键词:马来人,族群,本土主权,beschikkingstrecht,马来国王意志。