Indonesian and Tunisian Constitutional Frameworks: The Impact on the Development of Higher Education Curriculum

M. Ulpah
{"title":"Indonesian and Tunisian Constitutional Frameworks: The Impact on the Development of Higher Education Curriculum","authors":"M. Ulpah","doi":"10.56529/mer.v1i2.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education has a critical role in the development of a new generation of individuals. It all depends on the constitutional frameworks and norms around which educational institutions and educational praxis are founded, and education is one of the tools to maintain national identity. The quality of education cannot simply be measured by the percentage of GDP spent on education. According to the World Data Bank, Tunisia spends 26.63 percent of its budget on education, while Indonesia spends only 20.50 percent. However, this does not guarantee that the quality of education in Tunisia is higher than in Indonesia due to the cultural and constitutional framework disparities between the two countries. The aim of this study is to compare the higher education curricula in Tunisia, which was developed from the French secular, or laicite, system, with that in Indonesia, which is founded on the ideology of Pancasila. Moreover, this study aims to analyze how the laicite system and Pancasila ideology have an impact on higher education curriculum design. The method used is a qualitative approach with a comparative case study analysis. Data was obtained from interview sessions with policy makers on curriculum as well as from the handbooks of curriculum in the Faculty of Culture at Indonesia University and the curriculum of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Tunis University and focuses on the learning method and outcomes, as well as other journal and mass media pieces that are relevant. The data shows that disparities between constitutional frameworks and ideological contrasts between Pancasila and the laicite system have a significant impact on the religious component of the curriculum development process. In Tunisia, in particular, the curriculum has yet to achieve the government’s goal of developing critical consciousness. In Indonesia, the curriculum is based on the process model design, while in Tunisia, it is based on the product model design.","PeriodicalId":137333,"journal":{"name":"Muslim Education Review","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muslim Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56529/mer.v1i2.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Education has a critical role in the development of a new generation of individuals. It all depends on the constitutional frameworks and norms around which educational institutions and educational praxis are founded, and education is one of the tools to maintain national identity. The quality of education cannot simply be measured by the percentage of GDP spent on education. According to the World Data Bank, Tunisia spends 26.63 percent of its budget on education, while Indonesia spends only 20.50 percent. However, this does not guarantee that the quality of education in Tunisia is higher than in Indonesia due to the cultural and constitutional framework disparities between the two countries. The aim of this study is to compare the higher education curricula in Tunisia, which was developed from the French secular, or laicite, system, with that in Indonesia, which is founded on the ideology of Pancasila. Moreover, this study aims to analyze how the laicite system and Pancasila ideology have an impact on higher education curriculum design. The method used is a qualitative approach with a comparative case study analysis. Data was obtained from interview sessions with policy makers on curriculum as well as from the handbooks of curriculum in the Faculty of Culture at Indonesia University and the curriculum of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at Tunis University and focuses on the learning method and outcomes, as well as other journal and mass media pieces that are relevant. The data shows that disparities between constitutional frameworks and ideological contrasts between Pancasila and the laicite system have a significant impact on the religious component of the curriculum development process. In Tunisia, in particular, the curriculum has yet to achieve the government’s goal of developing critical consciousness. In Indonesia, the curriculum is based on the process model design, while in Tunisia, it is based on the product model design.
印度尼西亚和突尼斯宪法框架:对高等教育课程发展的影响
教育在新一代个人的发展中起着至关重要的作用。这一切都取决于教育机构和教育实践赖以建立的宪法框架和规范,而教育是维持国家认同的工具之一。教育质量不能简单地用教育支出占GDP的百分比来衡量。根据世界数据银行的数据,突尼斯将26.63%的预算用于教育,而印度尼西亚仅为20.50%。然而,这并不能保证突尼斯的教育质量比印度尼西亚高,因为两国之间的文化和宪法框架存在差异。本研究的目的是比较突尼斯的高等教育课程,突尼斯的高等教育课程是从法国的世俗或世俗制度发展而来的,而印度尼西亚的高等教育课程则是建立在潘卡西拉的意识形态基础上的。此外,本研究旨在分析政教分离制度和潘卡西拉思想对高等教育课程设计的影响。本文采用的方法是定性方法,并结合比较案例分析。数据来自与决策者就课程进行的访谈,以及印度尼西亚大学文化学院和突尼斯大学人文和社会科学学院的课程手册,并侧重于学习方法和成果,以及其他相关的期刊和大众媒体报道。数据显示,宪法框架之间的差异以及潘卡西拉与政教分离制度之间的意识形态差异对课程开发过程中的宗教成分产生了重大影响。特别是在突尼斯,课程还没有达到政府培养批判意识的目标。在印度尼西亚,课程以过程模型设计为基础,而在突尼斯,课程以产品模型设计为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信