Novel metrics for Analog Mixed-Signal coverage

Andreas Furtig, G. Glaeser, C. Grimm, L. Hedrich, S. Heinen, Hyun-Sek Lukas Lee, Gregor Nitsche, M. Olbrich, Carna Radojicic, Fabian Speicher
{"title":"Novel metrics for Analog Mixed-Signal coverage","authors":"Andreas Furtig, G. Glaeser, C. Grimm, L. Hedrich, S. Heinen, Hyun-Sek Lukas Lee, Gregor Nitsche, M. Olbrich, Carna Radojicic, Fabian Speicher","doi":"10.1109/DDECS.2017.7934589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On the contrary to the digital world, no coverage definition exists in the Analog/Mixed-Signal (AMS) context. As digital coverage helps digital designers and verification engineers to evaluate their verification progress, analog designers do not have such metrics. This paper proposes a set of different analog coverage metrics, which improve the confidence in AMS circuit verification. We will demonstrate, that no single overall coverage metric exists. However, as with digital coverage, the proposed analog coverage metrics could substantially help in rating the verification process. Illustrated by a complex AMS circuit example we will explore the limits of analog coverage methodologies as well as the benefits on different levels of abstraction ranging from transistor level up to system level.","PeriodicalId":330743,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 20th International Symposium on Design and Diagnostics of Electronic Circuits & Systems (DDECS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DDECS.2017.7934589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

On the contrary to the digital world, no coverage definition exists in the Analog/Mixed-Signal (AMS) context. As digital coverage helps digital designers and verification engineers to evaluate their verification progress, analog designers do not have such metrics. This paper proposes a set of different analog coverage metrics, which improve the confidence in AMS circuit verification. We will demonstrate, that no single overall coverage metric exists. However, as with digital coverage, the proposed analog coverage metrics could substantially help in rating the verification process. Illustrated by a complex AMS circuit example we will explore the limits of analog coverage methodologies as well as the benefits on different levels of abstraction ranging from transistor level up to system level.
模拟混合信号覆盖的新指标
与数字世界相反,在模拟/混合信号(AMS)环境中不存在覆盖定义。由于数字覆盖可以帮助数字设计师和验证工程师评估他们的验证进度,模拟设计师没有这样的指标。本文提出了一套不同的模拟覆盖指标,提高了AMS电路验证的置信度。我们将证明,不存在单一的总体覆盖度量。然而,与数字覆盖一样,提议的模拟覆盖度量可以在评估验证过程中提供实质性的帮助。通过一个复杂的AMS电路示例,我们将探讨模拟覆盖方法的局限性,以及从晶体管级到系统级的不同抽象级别的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信